Animal Marking Control System Power Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing animal marking and monitoring systems face challenges in efficiently managing the power consumption of visual or audio indicators, such as LEDs, which are crucial for extending the battery life of monitoring tags.

Innovation Solution

The animal marking control system employs a transceiver with multiple operation modes, allowing it to communicate with a remote base station at different frequencies. This system activates a marker unit, such as an LED, only when a specific marking need is indicated by the base station, optimizing power usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the marker unit (LED) is activated continuously to ensure visible identification, then the identification reliability is improved, but the battery power lifetime is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification reliabilityVSAvoidbattery lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The marker unit operates periodically rather than continuously. The system activates the LED only during specific time windows when animals are most likely to be observed (e.g., morning and evening hours), leaving it off during nighttime or unobserved periods. This periodic operation maintains identification reliability when needed while significantly extending battery lifetime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the marker unit's operation state based on real-time conditions. The processing circuitry receives animal location data and determines optimal activation timing, allowing the LED to be turned on only when the animal is in a location where it can be effectively observed, and turned off otherwise. This dynamic control optimizes the balance between identification reliability and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If the transceiver operates at high frequency to ensure timely communication, then the response speed is improved, but the power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication response speedVSAvoidtransceiver power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The transceiver uses periodic communication cycles with varying frequencies. During normal operation, it communicates at a lower frequency to conserve battery power. When a marking event occurs or urgent communication is needed, the system temporarily increases communication frequency to ensure timely response, then returns to lower frequency operation. This periodic frequency adjustment optimizes both response speed and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Loss of time

If the marker unit is activated frequently to ensure timely animal identification, then the identification timeliness is improved, but the battery power capacity is depleted faster

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification timelinessVSAvoidbattery power capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating optimal activation times based on historical data and animal behavior patterns. The processing circuitry determines the best moments to activate the marker unit before actual identification events occur, ensuring timely identification while avoiding unnecessary activations. This predictive approach optimizes the balance between timeliness and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from animal location tracking and observation data to optimize marker activation timing. The processing circuitry analyzes when animals are most likely to be observed and adjusts activation schedules accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures the marker is activated only when necessary for timely identification, avoiding wasteful energy consumption during periods when animals are unlikely to be observed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250113803A1Animal marking control system and method
Publication Date: 2025.04.10 SCR ENGINEERS LTD
  • US20250113803A1 patent drawing
  • US20250113803A1 patent drawing
  • US20250113803A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An animal marking control system includes: at least one transceiver communicatively coupled to a remote base station (BS) and configured to exchange data with the BS, the transceiver having a plurality of operation modes (OMs), each of the OMs defining a respective frequency of communication (FoC) of the transceiver with the BS; a marker unit configured to selectively mark the animal; a processing circuitry configured to: cause activation of the transceiver at a first OM of the OMs, wherein in the first OM the transceiver communicates with the BS in a first FoC; receive an indication of a marking need from the BS; upon receipt of the indication of a marking need, cause activation of the transceiver at a second OM of the OMs, wherein in the second OM the transceiver communicates with the BS in a second FoC; receive marker unit activation instructions; activate the marker unit.