Animal-Resistant Container Latch with Tilt Sensor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing animal-resistant containers are either difficult to use, not robust enough, or incompatible with fully-automated refuse collection systems, as they require manual re-engagement of latches and can be vulnerable to animal access during collection.

Innovation Solution

An animal-resistant container with a latch system that automatically engages and can be actuated by an automated refuse truck, featuring a tilt sensor to prevent animal access when the container is tipped, and a foam-reinforced design for added durability, manufactured using rotational molding for cost-effectiveness and light weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a latch system is used to prevent animal access, then security against animals is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates because users must manually unlatch and re-engage the latch

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanimal access preventionVSAvoidlatch manipulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The latch system automatically re-engages after the container lid is closed, eliminating the need for users to manually re-engage the latch. The system performs the securing action in advance before the user completes the closing operation, ensuring security without additional user effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The latch system serves itself by automatically detecting when the lid is closed and autonomously re-engaging the locking mechanism. This self-service capability removes the burden from the user of having to manually operate the latch after each use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Strength

If heavy reinforcing components are added to make the container more robust, then strength and durability are improved, but weight increases making the container difficult to move and incompatible with automated collection systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer robustnessVSAvoidcontainer weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The container walls are foamed to change the density parameter of the material, creating a lightweight structure with reduced weight while maintaining adequate strength through the foamed material's structural properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The container uses a composite structure combining a rigid outer shell with foamed interior material, creating a lightweight composite that provides both strength and weight reduction. This composite approach allows the container to be durable yet compatible with automated collection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If the container is designed for fully-automated collection, then collection efficiency is improved, but animal vulnerability increases when the container is placed in position and the latch must be disengaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefuse collection efficiencyVSAvoidanimal access prevention during collection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The latch system automatically re-engages as soon as the collection vehicle's manipulating arm releases the container, restoring security before the container is fully positioned. This preliminary re-engagement action prevents animal access during the brief window when the latch might be disengaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a sensor to detect when the lid is closed and provides feedback to the control mechanism, which then automatically re-engages the latch. This feedback loop ensures the latch is secured at the appropriate moment, maintaining security during automated collection operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If a tilt sensor is added to prevent latch actuation when tipped, then reliability against animal access is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatch security when tippedVSAvoidsensor and control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex electronic control with a simple mechanical tilt sensor mechanism that physically prevents latch actuation when the container is tipped. This mechanical substitution achieves the desired reliability with minimal added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8408607B2Animal-resistant container
Publication Date: 2013.04.02 NORTHLAND PRODUCTS INC
  • US8408607B2 patent drawing
  • US8408607B2 patent drawing
  • US8408607B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An animal-resistant container includes a body and a lid. The body has an interior volume in which refuse may be placed. At least one latch mechanism is secured in the body and at least one latch receptacle is secured in the lid. The latch mechanism is engaged with the latch receptacle to secure the lid to the body and prevent access to the interior volume. The latch mechanism can be actuated by a gripping arm of a refuse pickup vehicle to release the latch mechanism from the latch receptacle so that contents of the container can be emptied during automated collection. A tilt sensor detects tilting movement of the container, and the latch mechanism is prevented from actuation following detection of the tilting movement so that an animal intruder cannot tip over the container and gain entry into the container.