Anionic Reagent Complexes for Nanoparticle Synthesis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for synthesizing elemental nanoparticles are limited by size constraints, stoichiometric control issues, and applicability, particularly for metals like manganese, where chemical reduction techniques are ineffective due to resistance of Mn(II) to in situ reduction.

Innovation Solution

The development of Anionic Element Reagent Complexes (AERCs) and Ligated Anionic Reagent Complexes (LAERCs) that include a zero-valent element, a hydride molecule, and optionally a ligand, allowing for robust and reproducible nanoparticle synthesis through processes involving solvent addition or monoatomic cation incorporation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If chemical reduction techniques are used to synthesize nanoparticles, then the synthesis process is simple and effective for many metals, but the method fails for metals like manganese where precursor cations are resistant to chemical reduction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of nanoparticle synthesisVSAvoidapplicability to different elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the oxidation state parameter of the metal precursor from +2 (resistant to reduction) to 0 (elemental form) by using zero-valent metal sources. This parameter change enables the synthesis of nanoparticles for elements like manganese that are otherwise resistant to conventional chemical reduction methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces organic ligands as intermediary molecules that coordinate with zero-valent metal atoms, facilitating their stabilization and controlled transformation into nanoparticles. These ligands act as mediators between the zero-valent metal source and the final nanoparticle product, enabling synthesis for previously intractable elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If top-down physical methods are used to synthesize nanoparticles, then nanoparticles can be produced from macroscale metals, but the methods are expensive and unamenable to industrial scale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanoparticle size controlVSAvoidindustrial scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical top-down methods (milling, laser ablation, spark erosion) with a chemical bottom-up approach using zero-valent metal sources and organic ligands. This substitution eliminates the need for expensive industrial-scale mechanical equipment while enabling scalable synthesis through solution-phase chemistry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the synthesis approach from physical mechanical breakdown to chemical assembly by using zero-valent metal sources that can be reduced to nanoparticles through chemical reactions. This parameter change from physical to chemical methodology enables industrial scalability while maintaining nanoparticle size control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Length of stationary object

If direct milling methods are used to synthesize nanoparticles, then macroscale metal particles can be broken down, but production of particles smaller than 20 nm is difficult and stoichiometric ratios of alloys are hard to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanoparticle sizeVSAvoidstoichiometric ratio control
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-mixing zero-valent metal sources with organic ligands in specific stoichiometric ratios before the nanoparticle formation reaction. This preliminary mixing ensures precise control over the final nanoparticle composition and stoichiometry, avoiding the uncontrolled mechanical mixing inherent in direct milling methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces organic ligands as intermediary molecules that coordinate with zero-valent metal atoms during synthesis. These ligands act as templates and controlling agents that direct the formation of nanoparticles with precise sizes below 20 nm and controlled stoichiometric ratios, overcoming the limitations of direct mechanical milling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These complexes enable the synthesis of high-purity elemental and multi-element nanoparticles with controlled stoichiometry, overcoming size limitations and applicability issues of existing methods, and are applicable to a wide variety of elements, including manganese.

Implementation Method 1

Chemical approaches to bottom-up synthesis commonly involve the reduction of metal salt to elemental metal with nucleation seed particles or self-nucleation and growth into metal nanoparticles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS9643254B2Anionic reagent element complexes, their variations, and their uses
Publication Date: 2017.05.09 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US9643254B2 patent drawing
  • US9643254B2 patent drawing
  • US9643254B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A novel class of reagents, useful for synthesis of elemental nanoparticles, includes at least one element, formally in oxidation state zero in complex with a hydride molecule. The reagents can optionally include an additional ligand incorporated into the complex. Elemental nanoparticles are synthesized by adding solvent to the reagent, optionally with a free ligand and/or a monoatomic cation.