Anisotropic Refinement for Reservoir Fracture Meshing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current reservoir modeling techniques, such as structured and unstructured meshing, face challenges in accurately simulating fractures in hydrocarbon reservoirs, particularly when dealing with complex geometries, leading to inefficiencies and increased computational burdens.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of anisotropic geometry-adaptive refinement (AGAR) methods that modify a structured grid to create a computational mesh with higher resolution in near-fracture areas, allowing for accurate representation of fracture networks and reducing computational requirements by applying anisotropic refinement algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If structured meshing techniques are used, then mesh generation is robust and systematic, but mesh resolution in near-fracture areas is insufficient for accurate fracture modeling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemesh resolution in near-fracture areasVSAvoidmesh generation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing anisotropic refinement that selectively increases mesh resolution in near-fracture areas while maintaining coarser resolution in distant regions. This is achieved through geometry-adaptive algorithms that identify fracture surfaces and apply targeted refinement criteria only to cells adjacent to fractures, thereby improving local mesh quality without uniformly increasing global complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the computational domain into regions based on proximity to fracture surfaces. Cells are classified into near-fracture regions requiring high resolution and far-field regions acceptable with coarser resolution. This segmentation enables differential refinement strategies that improve critical areas while maintaining overall computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If fully-unstructured meshing techniques are used, then complex fracture geometries can be represented, but computational cost and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to represent complex fracture geometriesVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains structured mesh properties in far-field regions while applying unstructured refinement locally near fracture surfaces. This hybrid approach preserves the computational efficiency of structured meshes in bulk regions while capturing complex fracture geometries through localized unstructured refinement, thereby reducing overall computational complexity compared to fully-unstructured approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from isotropic refinement (uniform in all directions) to anisotropic refinement (directional and selective). By refining mesh cells preferentially in directions perpendicular to fracture surfaces while maintaining coarser resolution parallel to fractures, the method achieves accurate geometric representation with fewer total elements, reducing computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Manufacturing precision

If local grid refinement is applied, then mesh resolution near fractures is improved, but computational time increases for general reservoir geometries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemesh resolution near fracturesVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements geometry-adaptive refinement that automatically identifies fracture surfaces and applies refinement only to cells in near-fracture regions. This selective approach concentrates computational resources where they are most needed for accurate fracture modeling, avoiding the excessive computational time required by uniform refinement of entire reservoir models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs anisotropic refinement that changes mesh parameters directionally, refining cells primarily in the direction perpendicular to fracture surfaces while maintaining larger cell dimensions parallel to fractures. This parameter change strategy achieves accurate fracture representation with significantly fewer refined cells compared to isotropic refinement, reducing computational time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3167387B1Anisotropic geometry-adaptive refinement for reservoir mesh creation
Publication Date: 2023.01.11 LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORP
  • EP3167387B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3167387B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3167387B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method inserts fracture networks into an existing Earth Model that exists as a structured grid and physical property values. The fracture network is in the form of a surface mesh (manifold or non-manifold) in a three-dimensional ("3D") space. The structured grid of the Earth Model is then anisotropically refined to resolve the fractures and to provide appropriate cell grading in the near-fracture region. The generated Earth Model may be utilized in a variety of applications, including for example, a reservoir simulation.