Continuous Annealing Line Model-Predictive Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current continuous annealing lines lack precise regulation of the annealing process, leading to inconsistent quality and throughput in processed metallic strips, as process parameters are predetermined and not dynamically adjusted based on real-time material properties.

Innovation Solution

A model-predictive regulation method using computer-aided models that simulate material properties after the annealing process, allowing for real-time adjustment of process variables such as strip speed and temperature curve based on input variables like alloy composition, surface roughness, and grain size, to achieve desired quality standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If predetermined process parameters are used for annealing, then the annealing process is simple to operate, but the quality consistency and throughput are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidprocess parameter adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of annealing process parameters (temperature, speed, time) based on real-time material properties detected during processing. The system transitions from static predetermined parameters to dynamic adaptive parameters that automatically adjust according to actual material conditions, thereby improving quality consistency and throughput without requiring complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a feedback control mechanism where material properties are continuously monitored during the annealing process, and the detected properties are fed back to automatically adjust process parameters. This closed-loop feedback system ensures that deviations from target quality are corrected in real-time, improving both throughput and quality consistency while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If process parameters are dynamically adjusted based on real-time material properties, then quality consistency is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality consistencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service control system where the annealing process automatically adjusts its own parameters based on real-time material property detection. The system uses embedded algorithms that autonomously determine optimal process parameters without requiring external expert intervention or complex manual control, thereby achieving high manufacturing precision while keeping the control system manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in material properties (such as magnetic properties, electrical conductivity, or physical dimensions) as indicators to automatically adjust annealing process parameters. By establishing relationships between material property parameters and optimal process parameters, the system achieves precise quality control through automated parameter adaptation without requiring overly complex control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If empirical process data and experiments are used for each new steel good, then accurate process parameters are obtained, but the setup time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess parameter accuracyVSAvoidsetup time for new steel good
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary characterization of material properties using non-destructive or minimal-testing methods before the actual annealing process. By detecting key material properties (such as chemical composition indicators, microstructure characteristics, or physical properties) in advance, the system can pre-determine appropriate process parameter ranges, significantly reducing the setup time and experimental requirements for new steel goods while maintaining parameter accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses detected material properties as proxies or copies of the actual material characteristics to determine process parameters. Instead of requiring extensive empirical testing for each new steel good, the system creates a digital representation or model based on rapid property detection, which then guides the annealing process. This copying approach eliminates the need for time-consuming physical experiments while maintaining parameter accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9732396B2Method for operating a continuous annealing line for the processing of a rolled good
Publication Date: 2017.08.15 PRIMETALS TECH GERMANY GMBH
  • US9732396B2 patent drawing
  • US9732396B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method operates a continuous annealing line for the processing of a rolled good, in particular a metal strip. A property of the rolled good in relation to a point or a section of the rolled good is fed to a computer-aided model as an input variable. The point or the section of the rolled good is located before or in the continuous annealing line. For the purpose of precise control of the continuous annealing process, at least one material property of the rolled good after the continuous annealing process is simulated by the computer-aided model and compared with a specified target value. If the simulated material property deviates from the target value, at least one process variable of the continuous annealing process is controlled as long as the point or the section of the rolled good is located before or in the continuous annealing line.