Training Data Generation Using Annotated Processed and Raw Images

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AI-based image recognition technologies face challenges in utilizing training data that is optimized for human visibility rather than machine learning, leading to suboptimal performance in visual recognition tasks.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates training data by reflecting annotation results from images optimized for human visibility onto raw images, creating a combination of processed and unprocessed image data for machine learning, and records this data with metadata for multimodal learning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If annotation results from processed images are used for training, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of annotationVSAvoidtraining data accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training data into two distinct components: processed images (second image data) used for annotation and raw images (first image data) used for training. This segmentation allows annotators to work with enhanced images while the model trains on original images, resolving the contradiction between annotation ease and training accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces processed image data as an intermediary medium. This intermediary serves as a bridge that makes annotation easier while the connection to raw image data ensures training precision. The processed images act as a mediator that facilitates the annotation process without compromising the quality of training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If only processed image data is used for training, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation accuracyVSAvoidinference accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent clearly separates the annotation source (processed images) from the training source (raw images). This segmentation ensures that the convenience of annotated processed images does not compromise the reliability of training, as the model learns from unprocessed original data that preserves all diagnostic information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Processed images serve as an intermediary that facilitates accurate annotation while the raw images maintain reliability for training. The intermediary processed images enable annotators to achieve high accuracy, while the connection to raw images ensures the trained model maintains reliability for clinical inference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If processed and raw image data are combined, then information completeness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data processing pipeline into distinct stages: annotation processing on second image data and training processing on first image data. This segmentation manages complexity by handling different data types in separate, well-defined processes rather than mixing them throughout the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a unified training data generation apparatus that handles both processed and raw image data through multi-functional processing units. The same apparatus performs annotation reflection, data pairing, and training set generation, reducing overall system complexity despite handling multiple data types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12475389B2Training data generation device, recording method, and inference device
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 OLYMPUS CORPORATION(JP)
  • US12475389B2 patent drawing
  • US12475389B2 patent drawing
  • US12475389B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A training data generation device includes a computer, and a computer-readable storage medium. The computer is configured to: receive an input of an annotation for second image data obtained by imaging an observation target; reflect a result of the annotation in first image data that is related to the same observation target as the observation target of the second image data, the first image data having a different at least one of imaging mode and display mode from the second image data; and generate training data for creating an inference model by using the first image data and the result of the annotation reflected in the first image data, the first image data including image data of a plurality of images, and the second image data being image data of an image obtained by combining the plurality of images included in the first image data.