Annotation Assisting Apparatus for Zero Anaphora Resolution
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The existing methods for Japanese anaphora resolution, including zero anaphora resolution, face challenges in achieving high precision and recall due to the high cost and labor-intensive process of creating training data, which requires extensive human judgment and annotation.
Innovation Solution
An annotation assisting apparatus that utilizes morphological analysis, dependency parsing, and language knowledge to automatically detect zero anaphors and their antecedents, providing candidates for human selection, thereby reducing the need for extensive manual annotation and improving efficiency.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If manual annotation is used to create training data for (zero-)anaphora resolution, then high precision and recall can be achieved, but the cost and time required become prohibitively high
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary automated annotation using morphological analysis, dependency parsing, and language knowledge to generate candidate annotations before human review. This preliminary action reduces the time and effort required for manual annotation while maintaining high precision, as annotators only need to review and correct candidates rather than create annotations from scratch
Solution Approach 2:
The system introduces an intermediary automated annotation layer that generates candidate annotations using morphological analysis, dependency parsing, and language knowledge. This intermediary provides high-quality candidates that require minimal human correction, thus achieving high precision while significantly reducing the time and cost of training data creation
2Measurement precision
If manual annotation is used to create training data for (zero-)anaphora resolution, then high precision and recall can be achieved, but the cost becomes prohibitively high
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary automated annotation using morphological analysis, dependency parsing, and language knowledge to generate candidate annotations before human review. This preliminary action reduces the time and effort required for manual annotation while maintaining high precision, as annotators only need to review and correct candidates rather than create annotations from scratch
Solution Approach 2:
The system introduces an intermediary automated annotation layer that generates candidate annotations using morphological analysis, dependency parsing, and language knowledge. This intermediary provides high-quality candidates that require minimal human correction, thus achieving high precision while significantly reducing the time and cost of training data creation
3Loss of time
If automated methods are used for (zero-)anaphora resolution, then the cost and time of training data creation are reduced, but the precision and recall remain insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements feedback through interactive review where annotators correct automated annotations and the system learns from these corrections. The feedback loop allows the automated system to improve its precision over time while maintaining efficient training data creation, combining the speed of automation with the precision of human judgment
Solution Approach 2:
The system introduces an intermediary automated annotation layer that generates candidate annotations using morphological analysis, dependency parsing, and language knowledge. This intermediary provides high-quality candidates that require minimal human correction, thus achieving high precision while significantly reducing the time and cost of training data creation
4Reliability
If more training data is collected to improve (zero-)anaphora resolution performance, then the performance can be enhanced, but the cost and time for data preparation increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary automated annotation using morphological analysis, dependency parsing, and language knowledge to generate candidate annotations before human review. This preliminary action reduces the time and effort required for manual annotation while maintaining high precision, as annotators only need to review and correct candidates rather than create annotations from scratch
Solution Approach 2:
The system introduces an intermediary automated annotation layer that generates candidate annotations using morphological analysis, dependency parsing, and language knowledge. This intermediary provides high-quality candidates that require minimal human correction, thus achieving high precision while significantly reducing the time and cost of training data creation
Data Source
AI summary
An annotation data generation assisting system includes: an input/output device receiving an input through an interactive process; morphological analysis system 380 and dependency parsing system performing morphological and dependency parsing on text data in text archive; first to fourth candidate generating units detecting a zero anaphor or a referring expression in the dependency relation of a predicate in a sequence of morphemes, identifying a position as an object of annotation and estimating candidates of expressions to be inserted by using language knowledge; a candidate DB storing estimated candidates; and an interactive annotation device reading candidates of annotation from candidate DB and annotate a candidate selected by an interactive process by input/output device.


