Annotation Label Display Using Likelihood Scores to Reduce Mislabeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing annotation tools for machine learning may inadvertently include irrelevant labels in learning data due to incorrect candidate presentation, leading to degraded prediction accuracy in machine learning models.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that estimates candidate labels using a trained model, controls display positions based on likelihood scores, and provides differentiated display information to assist users in selecting appropriate labels, thereby reducing incorrect selections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If candidates for labels are extracted and presented to users using a trained model, then the work load on users is reduced, but irrelevant labels may be included in learning data due to incorrect candidate presentation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework load reductionVSAvoidaccuracy of learning data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the display presentation of candidate labels based on their individual likelihood scores. High-scoring candidates receive prominent display positions while low-scoring candidates are displayed less prominently or with indicators suggesting lower reliability. This allows the system to maintain automated candidate extraction for productivity while ensuring data reliability through differentiated presentation that guides user selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the display parameters (position, size, visual emphasis) of candidate labels based on their likelihood scores from the trained model. By dynamically adjusting these presentation parameters, the system maintains the efficiency of automated candidate generation while improving data accuracy through score-based differentiation in the user interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple candidate labels are displayed to users for selection, then the accuracy of label selection can be improved, but the complexity of the annotation tool increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of label selectionVSAvoidcomplexity of annotation tool
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by using the trained model to pre-analyze target data and extract candidate labels with calculated likelihood scores before presenting them to users. This preliminary processing reduces the complexity of the annotation task while maintaining selection accuracy, as users only need to review pre-processed candidates rather than creating labels from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by having the trained model generate candidate labels that replicate or approximate the correct annotations. These copied candidates are then presented to users for verification, maintaining accuracy while simplifying the user's workload compared to creating annotations manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If automated extraction of label candidates is used, then productivity is improved, but the quality of learning data may degrade due to incorrect selections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of annotationVSAvoidquality of learning data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using the likelihood scores from the trained model to guide the presentation of candidate labels to users. Users can see which candidates have higher confidence scores and make more informed selections. This feedback mechanism maintains the productivity benefits of automated extraction while improving data quality through score-informed user decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The likelihood score acts as an intermediary between the automated extraction process and the final label selection. It mediates by providing quantitative information about candidate quality, allowing the system to maintain automation efficiency while ensuring data quality through the intermediary scoring mechanism that guides user choices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12511531B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 CANON KK
  • US12511531B2 patent drawing
  • US12511531B2 patent drawing
  • US12511531B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus is provided and includes an obtaining unit obtains an estimation result of a score representing a likelihood for each of a first candidate and a second candidate for a label to be added as an annotation to data to be annotated. A control unit controls processing for displaying, depending on the score for each of the first candidate and the second candidate, first display information and second display information through an output unit, the first display information indicating a display position associated with the first candidate, the second display information indicating a display position associated with the second candidate.