Annotation-Guided Prompting for Multi-Style Document Summaries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for generating summaries are inefficient as they require manual adjustments and lack the ability to produce high-quality summaries, which are not optimized for different focus, tone, and writing styles.

Innovation Solution

An AI-based workflow tool that utilizes annotations within documents to generate summaries, leveraging these annotations to guide the generative AI logic to produce multiple summaries with different stylistic and thematic variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustments and experimentation with different LLMs are performed to improve summary quality, then summary accuracy and focus can be improved, but the time and labor required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary qualityVSAvoidtime and labor
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically generating multiple summary variations with different focuses, tones, and writing styles before human review. This pre-generates multiple options that would otherwise require extensive manual experimentation to create, thereby reducing the time and labor needed for subsequent adjustments while maintaining high summary quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by varying multiple dimensions of summary generation simultaneously - including focus area, tone, writing style, and target audience - to produce diverse summary variations. This automated parameter exploration replaces manual experimentation with different LLMs and prompt configurations, achieving high-quality summaries faster without requiring extensive human time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If a single summary is generated without considering multiple styles and tones, then the generation process is faster, but the summary may not effectively appeal to the targeted readers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneration speedVSAvoidadaptability to different readers
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the summary generation task into multiple parallel processes, each producing a summary variation with a specific focus, tone, or writing style. Instead of generating one summary sequentially after extensive deliberation, the system simultaneously generates multiple segmented versions that can be evaluated and selected based on reader appropriateness, maintaining both speed and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality by creating a multi-functional summary generation capability that produces summaries suitable for different target audiences, purposes, and contexts from the same source material. This allows a single generation process to serve multiple functions and reader types, making the system adaptable without sacrificing generation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If reviewers manually rewrite summaries to better appeal to targeted readers, then the summaries become more effective, but the process becomes time intensive and prevents scaling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary effectivenessVSAvoidscaling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically generating multiple summary variations optimized for different target readers and purposes without requiring manual rewriting. The AI system serves itself by internally exploring different summary approaches and producing polished outputs that would otherwise require human reviewer intervention, thereby maintaining effectiveness while enabling scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes to automatically adjust summary characteristics - such as tone, focus, and writing style - to match different target audiences. This automated parameter optimization replaces manual rewriting efforts, achieving effective summaries for various readerships while maintaining productivity and enabling the process to scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250371254A1System and method for annotation-guided document summarization in the generation of multiple summaries through generative artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 MH SUB I LLC
  • US20250371254A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371254A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371254A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing device operating with generative artificial intelligence (AI) logic for condensing content of a document to produce a summary is described. The computing device comprises at least a processor and a non-transitory storage medium coupled to the processor. The non-transitory storage medium includes an artificial intelligence (AI) summarization workflow software tool configured to identify and extract annotations associated with a document, generate one or more prompts including the annotations and content associated with the document, and output the one or more prompts to generative AI logic. The computing device is further configured to receive from generative AI logic a plurality of summaries in response to the one or more prompts, where a first summary of the plurality of summaries is formed with at least a different writing style than a second summary of the plurality of summaries.