Annotation Proposal System Using Grouping and Ranking Models
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The process of annotating data for training artificial intelligence models is time-consuming and complex, requiring substantial human effort, which impairs the ability to train models with high accuracy.
Innovation Solution
A system and method that propose annotations by applying grouping and ranking models to input data, predicting concepts, and displaying them to users through a user interface, allowing for efficient and automated annotation processing.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If manual annotation is performed, then annotation accuracy can be maintained, but time consumption increases substantially
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary annotation by automatically generating annotation proposals using machine learning models before human review. The grouping model pre-processes input data to generate initial annotations, which then serve as a foundation for human annotators to review and refine, significantly reducing the time required for complete annotation while maintaining accuracy through human verification.
Solution Approach 2:
The system introduces machine learning models as intermediaries between the input data and human annotators. The grouping model and ranking model act as mediators that generate annotation proposals, allowing human annotators to focus only on reviewing and refining the automated suggestions rather than performing all annotation work manually, thus reducing time consumption while preserving accuracy.
2Loss of time
If automated annotation is used, then time consumption is reduced, but annotation quality may deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements feedback mechanisms where human annotators review automated annotation proposals and provide corrections. These feedback loops allow the system to learn from human corrections and improve future automated annotations. The feedback from human review ensures that annotation quality remains high while the automated process continues to reduce time consumption.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary automated annotation using machine learning models, then allows human annotators to review and refine these pre-generated annotations. This preliminary action by the automated system handles the time-consuming bulk annotation, while human review ensures quality, effectively addressing both time reduction and quality maintenance.
3Adaptability or versatility
If multiple models are applied to predict concepts, then annotation coverage increases, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments the annotation process into distinct stages: a grouping model that performs initial concept prediction and a ranking model that refines and orders the predictions. This segmentation allows each model to specialize in specific tasks, increasing overall annotation coverage while managing complexity through modular architecture where each component has a clear, defined function.
Solution Approach 2:
The grouping model performs preliminary concept prediction across multiple categories, establishing a broad annotation coverage foundation. Subsequently, the ranking model refines these predictions by ordering concepts based on relevance. This preliminary action by the grouping model expands coverage before the refining stage, achieving high annotation coverage while managing system complexity through staged processing.
Data Source
AI summary
Systems, methods and computer program code to propose annotations are provided which include identifying an input, applying a grouping model to the input to predict at least a first grouping concept associated with the input, comparing the at least first grouping concept to a set of relationship data to select at least a first ranking model, applying the at least first ranking model to the input to predict at least a first ranking concept associated with the input, and causing a user interface to display the input, the at least first grouping concept and the at least first ranking concept to a user as proposed annotations of the input.


