Annular Catalytic Reactor Radial Contact Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing catalytic reactors face issues with heat transfer efficiency due to low thermal conductivity in ceramic materials, thermal mismatch leading to material pulverization, poor performance near the reactor's center, and metallic creep causing gaps between the reactor and the outer tube, which reduces efficiency and shortens the reactor's lifespan.

Innovation Solution

A metallic reactor with an annular cross-section and an expandable corrugated inner tube, featuring coned washers or corrugated flaps that maintain contact with the outer tube by expanding radially to compensate for creep, ensuring efficient heat transfer and reaction occurrence near the outer tube's surface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If ceramic materials are used in the reactor, then catalytic reactions can be performed, but heat transfer efficiency deteriorates due to low thermal conductivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic reaction efficiencyVSAvoidheat transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite structure combining ceramic catalyst pellets with a metallic support framework. The metallic framework (high thermal conductivity) provides structural support and heat transfer pathways, while the ceramic catalyst pellets (catalytically active) are distributed within this framework. This composite approach allows simultaneous achievement of catalytic functionality and efficient heat transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If ceramic materials are used in the reactor, then catalytic reactions can be performed, but structural reliability deteriorates due to thermal mismatch and pulverization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalytic reaction efficiencyVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The metallic support framework provides thermal compatibility and structural integrity, preventing the thermal mismatch and pulverization issues that occur when ceramic materials are directly exposed to temperature gradients. The framework acts as a buffer that accommodates thermal expansion differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Different materials are assigned to different functional zones: the metallic framework provides mechanical support and heat transfer in regions subject to thermal stress, while ceramic catalyst pellets provide catalytic activity in regions optimized for chemical reactions. This local optimization of material properties resolves the contradiction between catalytic performance and structural reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Volume of stationary object

If the reactor occupies substantially all space within the cylindrical outer tube, then space utilization is maximized, but heat transfer efficiency deteriorates near the center of the reactor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidheat transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor interior is segmented into an annular region where catalytic reactions occur and a central region occupied by the support framework. This segmentation creates optimized heat transfer pathways through the metallic framework while maintaining high space utilization in the annular catalytic zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support framework introduces a three-dimensional structure with radial, axial, and circumferential heat transfer pathways. This multi-dimensional heat transfer network overcomes the limitation of radial heat transfer alone, efficiently conducting heat from the outer tube surface through the framework to the catalytic reactions throughout the reactor volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of manufacture

If the reactor is stuffed into a large metallic outer tube, then compact installation is achieved, but performance deteriorates over time due to metallic creep causing gaps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation simplicityVSAvoidcontact stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The support framework incorporates expandable corrugated sections that can dynamically adjust their dimensions in response to thermal expansion and creep of the outer tube. This dynamic adaptability maintains continuous contact between the reactor assembly and the outer tube throughout the operational life, compensating for dimensional changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The corrugated structure's geometric parameters (expansion ratio, wave amplitude) are designed to match the expected creep characteristics of the outer tube material at operating temperatures. This parameter optimization ensures that the framework expands at a rate that maintains contact pressure despite tube diameter growth over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The annular reactor design enhances heat transfer efficiency, maintains contact with the outer tube, and is easier to manufacture, achieving higher conversion rates and prolonging the reactor's lifespan by preventing gaps and thermal mismatch issues.

Implementation Method 1

The pressure creates a large hoop stress, which the tube material has difficulty resisting at the high temperature. Over a period of years, creep in the metal outer tube causes the diameter of the tube to grow.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCreep: Creep

Implementation Method 2

The reactor is intended to be stuffed into a large metallic outer tube and operated at high temperatures (in the range of 850-900° C) and high pressures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 3

Packed bed ceramic catalysts have the disadvantage that they have low thermal conductivity, making it difficult to transfer heat from the periphery of the reactor to the inside

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentEP1910765B1Reactor having improved heat transfer
Publication Date: 2013.05.08 CATACEL CORP
  • EP1910765B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP1910765B1 patent drawingFigure 4
  • EP1910765B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A catalytic reactor or heat exchanger includes a monolith defining a plurality of leaves, the monolith having a generally annular cross -section. The monolith is disposed within a generally cylindrical outer tube, and around a corrugated inner tube. The reactor includes a device for urging the monolith radially outward, so as to maintain contact between the monolith and the outer tube. Such device may include a coned washer, or it may be defined by a folded flap that is integral with the inner tube. In either case, the reactor compensates for metal creep, and virtually insures continued contact between the monolith and the outer tube.