Annular Display Knob Layout for Compact Appliance Controls

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing operator control devices for domestic appliances, combining electronic display panels and movable control elements, face challenges in achieving a compact design while ensuring user-friendly operability and intuitive information presentation, often resulting in large and clumsy components that require significant space.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates an annular operator control element with an inwardly inclined upper face, embedded in the electronic display panel's cover, allowing for precise rotation and touchability, utilizing a sliding ring with low-friction materials and magnets for effortless movement, and a light-permeable cover for compactness and user-friendly interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If conventional cylindrical control knobs are used, then they provide sufficient grip area for rotation, but they require large space and result in a bulky design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace requirementVSAvoidgrip and rotation
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control element is segmented into a flat annular front part and a cylindrical rear part. The annular front part provides the user interface surface for finger contact and rotation, while the cylindrical rear part provides structural support and mounting functionality. This segmentation allows the control element to maintain rotational operability with significantly reduced overall volume compared to a fully cylindrical design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Volume of moving object

If the control element is made compact, then space is saved, but it becomes difficult to rotate precisely with finger contact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol element sizeVSAvoidrotational position accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control element transitions from a purely cylindrical three-dimensional form to a flattened annular structure with reduced height dimension. The annular shape provides a larger diameter rotational path while maintaining a compact vertical profile. This dimensional change allows precise rotational control through finger contact on the annular surface while keeping the overall control element size compact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If the upper face is made flat and raised, then precise finger contact and rotation are enabled, but the component height increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetouchability and rotational guidanceVSAvoidprojection from panel
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Only the annular front part of the control element is raised with an inclined upper face to provide the necessary touchability and rotational guidance surface. The rest of the control element maintains a low profile. This localized raising provides the required operational interface while minimizing the overall projection height from the panel surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If the annular front part is made with low-friction materials, then effortless rotation is achieved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation effortVSAvoidmaterial selection and assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The control element uses composite construction with the annular front part made from low-friction materials such as PTFE (Teflon) or other lubricious polymers. This material selection reduces the coefficient of friction between the finger and control surface, enabling effortless rotation. The composite approach combines different materials with complementary properties to achieve both operational ease and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables a compact, user-friendly, and precise operator control device that saves space while allowing for easy setting of operating conditions, improving usability and reducing mechanical force required for rotation compared to conventional cylindrical controls.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing a sliding ring with low-friction materials and magnets for effortless movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

utilizing a sliding ring with low-friction materials and magnets for effortless movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Implementation Method 3

a light-permeable cover for compactness and user-friendly interaction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight transmission: Light

Data Source

PatentUS10082925B2Operator control device for a domestic appliance, having an electronic display panel, and a domestic appliance having such an operator control device
Publication Date: 2018.09.25 BSH HAUSGERATE GMBH
  • US10082925B2 patent drawing
  • US10082925B2 patent drawing
  • US10082925B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An operator control device for a domestic appliance includes an electronic display panel having a cover, and an operator control element which is movable relative to the display panel to set operating conditions of the domestic appliance. The operator control element is embedded, at least in part, in the cover of the electronic display panel, and includes an annular front part having an upper face which projects, at least in part, above a level of an outer face of the cover.