Annular Flow Restrictor for Drilling BHA Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In directional drilling, especially in Motor-Assisted Rotary Steerable Systems (MARSS), the radial bearing wear causes excessive leakage of drilling fluid, leading to insufficient hydraulic pressure for steering the drill bit and potential erosion issues.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an annular flow restrictor within the bearing assembly, which uses an annular gap to control the bypass flow of drilling fluid, thereby maintaining sufficient hydraulic pressure and reducing erosion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If radial bearing gaps are used to control mud flow leakage, then initial flow restriction is achieved, but flow restriction degrades over time due to bearing wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow restriction consistencyVSAvoidbearing service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control function is segmented into two independent components: radial bearings for mechanical support and an annular flow restrictor for fluid control. This separation ensures that bearing wear does not affect flow restriction, as the restrictor is a dedicated component with a fixed annular gap that maintains consistent flow control throughout the bearing's service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The annular flow restrictor acts as an intermediary element between the driveshaft bore and the annulus. It provides a controlled pathway for drilling fluid bypass flow, maintaining a consistent annular gap that restricts flow independently of bearing condition. This intermediary component decouples the flow control function from the mechanical support function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If bypass flow rate is increased to lubricate bearings, then bearing lubrication is improved, but drilling fluid loss to annulus increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebearing lubricationVSAvoiddrilling fluid loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The annular gap dimensions of the flow restrictor are carefully designed to control the bypass flow rate within an optimal range. This parameter optimization ensures sufficient flow for bearing lubrication while minimizing excessive fluid loss to the annulus. The restrictor maintains this optimized flow rate consistently throughout operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The flow restrictor creates a localized flow control zone with a specific annular gap geometry. This localized restriction ensures that bypass flow remains controlled at the bearing section, providing adequate lubrication without allowing excessive flow to escape to the annulus. The local quality of the restrictor's annular gap provides precise flow management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If choke is used to control bypass flow, then radial bearing wear issue is solved, but metal-to-metal face seal degrades due to abrasion and high pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebypass flow controlVSAvoidseal degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control function is extracted from the choke assembly with its metal-to-metal face seal and placed into a dedicated annular flow restrictor. This extraction eliminates the harmful metal-to-metal sealing interface that was subject to abrasion degradation from high-velocity bypass flow and high pressure. The annular restrictor uses a non-contacting gap between rotating and stationary components, avoiding seal degradation entirely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical face seal system is replaced with a fluid dynamic flow restriction system. Instead of using a metal-to-metal choke seal to control bypass flow, the invention uses an annular gap flow restrictor that controls flow through viscous effects and pressure gradient in the annular space. This substitution eliminates the mechanical contact and associated wear problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of manufacture

If material options are limited for high pressure/volume loading, then manufacturing is simplified, but flow control reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial selectionVSAvoidflow control under high PV loading
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The annular flow restrictor employs composite construction combining a rotating inner component attached to the driveshaft with a stationary outer component. This composite structure distributes high pressure and velocity loads across different materials and components, with each optimized for its specific loading conditions. The composite design enhances reliability under high PV loading while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The annular flow restrictor effectively controls the bypass flow, ensuring consistent hydraulic pressure for steering the drill bit and reducing the risk of erosion, thus enhancing the reliability and efficiency of directional drilling operations.

Implementation Method 1

The flow restrictor includes an annular gap to control the bypass flow of drilling fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow through annular gap: Couette Flow

Data Source

PatentUS12305511B2Drilling system with mud motor and annular flow restrictor
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US12305511B2 patent drawing
  • US12305511B2 patent drawing
  • US12305511B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A bottom hole assembly (“BHA”) includes a driveshaft including a bore through which the drilling fluid is flowable. The BHA also includes a bearing assembly configured to rotatably support the driveshaft that includes a radial bearing with an internal radial gap; an annular flow restrictor with an inner sleeve and an outer sleeve separated by a restrictor clearance; and a bypass fluid flow path open to the bore and extending through the radial gap and the restrictor clearance such that at least some drilling fluid is diverted from the bore into the bypass fluid flow path. The restrictor clearance is sized to restrict flow of the drilling fluid diverted through the bypass fluid flow path to control a pressure of the drilling fluid in the driveshaft. The outer sleeve is dynamically radially supported such that a radial load absorbed by the annular flow restrictor is below a selected threshold.