Annular Groove Torque Absorption in Support Ring-Free Plastic Containers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Plastic containers without a support ring face challenges in absorbing torque and snapping forces during closure, leading to potential deformations due to reduced mechanical strength from thinner walls, and existing solutions require costly conversions to accommodate automatic closing devices.

Innovation Solution

A plastic container design featuring a circumferential annular groove near the container neck, which acts as an abutment to absorb torque and snapping forces, allowing for automatic closure without a support ring, and is produced during the blow molding process to maintain structural integrity and compatibility with existing closing devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If plastic containers are produced with thinner walls to reduce weight and cost, then weight and manufacturing cost are reduced, but mechanical strength and ability to absorb torque are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer weightVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a circumferential annular groove at the specific location where the container neck adjoins the container body. This groove concentrates material and structural strength locally at the critical torque absorption zone, allowing the rest of the container walls to remain thin for weight reduction while maintaining sufficient mechanical strength where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If a support ring is removed to simplify structure and reduce material, then device complexity and material usage are reduced, but ability to absorb torque and support closure forces is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidtorque absorption capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the support ring component entirely from the container design. Instead of using a separate support ring element, the invention integrates the torque absorption function directly into the container wall structure through the circumferential annular groove, simplifying the overall structure by eliminating an additional component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the functions of the container wall and the support structure into a single integrated element. The circumferential annular groove creates a reinforced zone within the container wall itself that performs both structural containment and torque absorption functions, eliminating the need for a separate support ring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If automatic closure devices are used on containers without support rings, then closure speed and automation are improved, but container deformation occurs due to insufficient torque absorption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure speedVSAvoidcontainer shape stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The circumferential annular groove is pre-formed during the blow molding process, creating the torque absorption structure before the closure operation takes place. This preliminary structural preparation ensures that when automatic closure devices apply torque during high-speed operation, the container is already equipped with the necessary reinforcement to prevent deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The annular groove effectively absorbs torque and snapping forces, enabling reliable automatic closure of plastic containers without a support ring, while maintaining reduced wall thickness and compatibility with existing closing devices, thus optimizing weight and ecological balance.

Implementation Method 1

a circumferential annular groove (10) is formed, which is produced in a blow molding process. At least one abutment (16) for absorbing torque is formed within the annular groove (10)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the preform is finally inflated with a gas blown in at overpressure, usually air, according to the mold cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOverpressure inflation: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentEP3187430B1Support ring-free plastic container, especially plastic bottle
Publication Date: 2018.05.16 ALPLA WERKE ALWIN LEHNER
  • EP3187430B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3b
  • EP3187430B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A support-ringless plastic container (1) is described, comprising a container body (2) and a container neck (5) with a pouring opening (20). Adjacent to the pouring opening (20), fastening means (6) for the positive locking of a closure are provided in an outer wall (6) of the plastic container (1). In a region between the container neck (5) and the container body (2), in an area close to the fastening means (6) for the positive locking of a closure, a circumferential annular groove (10) is formed, which is produced by a blow molding process. Within the annular groove (10), at least one abutment (16) for torque absorption is formed.