Fuel Injector Airflow Layout for Hydrogen Autoignition Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Turbine engines using hydrogen fuel face challenges with higher flame speeds and reactivity, leading to increased risks of flashback and autoignition, which can damage the fuel injector and surrounding components.

Innovation Solution

A fuel injector design that incorporates non-swirling airflow for fuel supply and additional air supply to introduce swirl or turbulence, enhancing mixing and reducing the risk of flashback and autoignition, while accommodating low-emission fuels like hydrogen.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If hydrogen fuel is used in turbine engines, then low-emission operation is achieved, but flashback and autoignition risks increase due to higher flame speeds and reactivity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionVSAvoidflashback and autoignition risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel injector divides the fuel supply into multiple separate fuel passages instead of a single passage, allowing different fuel streams to be injected at different locations and angles. This segmentation prevents flashback propagation by creating physical barriers and reduces autoignition risk by distributing fuel injection points throughout the combustion chamber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a non-swirling air passage that supplies air as an intermediary medium between the fuel injection point and the combustion zone. This non-swirling airflow acts as a protective barrier that stabilizes the flame front and prevents flashback while maintaining proper fuel-air mixing for complete combustion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If fuel is injected directly into the combustion chamber, then combustion efficiency is improved, but flashback risk increases due to direct exposure to high-velocity flames

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidflashback risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the combustion chamber are provided with different flow characteristics through dedicated passages. The non-swirling air passage provides a calm, low-velocity region for initial fuel mixing, while swirling air passages further downstream provide turbulence for complete combustion. This local differentiation allows efficient combustion without flashback risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Fuel is pre-mixed with air in the non-swirling passage before entering the main combustion zone. This preliminary mixing action ensures proper fuel-air ratio is established before combustion begins, improving combustion efficiency while the controlled mixing environment prevents premature ignition and flashback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Stability of the object's composition

If swirling airflow is used for fuel mixing, then combustion stability is improved, but autoignition risk increases due to enhanced turbulence and oxygen availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion stabilityVSAvoidautoignition risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The air supply is segmented into non-swirling and swirling components that operate in sequence. The non-swirling portion provides stable, controlled mixing that prevents autoignition, while the swirling portion further downstream enhances combustion stability without creating conditions for premature ignition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a spatial dimension to the mixing process by using three-dimensional swirling flow patterns in addition to the axial non-swirling flow. This multi-dimensional approach allows the fuel-air mixture to achieve stable combustion through controlled turbulence in specific regions while maintaining autoignition-free conditions in the injection zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design ensures stable operation with low-emission fuels by minimizing pressure drop and eliminating flashback and autoignition risks, improving component durability and reducing maintenance costs.

Implementation Method 1

the set of air passages are arranged tangentially relative to the outer wall to impart a swirl to a flow of air provided from the set of air passages to the interior

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSwirl flow: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

additional air supply to introduce swirl or turbulence, enhancing mixing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS20260009541A1Turbine engine with a fuel injector
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US20260009541A1 patent drawing
  • US20260009541A1 patent drawing
  • US20260009541A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A turbine engine has a compression section, combustion section, and turbine section in serial flow arrangement. The turbine engine includes a fuel injector for providing fuel and air to the combustion section. The fuel injector includes an outer wall in annular arrangement extending from a forward end to an outlet, surrounding an interior having a non-swirling air passage, and defining a longitudinal axis. A fuel passage fluidly couples to the interior and a set of air passages are in annular arrangement about and extending through the outer wall and fluidly coupled to the interior. The set of air passages are arranged tangentially relative to the outer wall to impart a swirl to a flow of air provided from the set of air passages to the interior.