Annular Electric Motor Vibration Suppressor for Rotary-Wing Aircraft

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vibration suppressor systems for rotary-wing aircraft are heavy, costly, and unable to adjust in-flight to varying in-plane load frequencies, limiting their effectiveness and increasing maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

An annular electric motor system with a control system that independently rotates masses about the axis of rotation to reduce in-plane vibrations, allowing for dynamic adjustment of rotational speed and angular position to counteract vibratory loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If spiral spring vibration isolators are used to suppress in-plane vibrations, then vibration suppression is achieved, but the device weight increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration suppressionVSAvoidisolator weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical spiral spring system with an active control system using actuators and sensors. The active control system uses electronic signals and feedback control to generate counter-vibrations, eliminating the need for heavy mechanical springs while achieving the same vibration suppression effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a passive static spring system to a dynamic active control system that can adjust its characteristics in real-time. The active control system modifies its response based on actual vibration conditions, allowing weight reduction while maintaining or improving vibration suppression performance across varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If spiral spring vibration isolators are designed with precise tolerances for exact spring rates, then vibration suppression effectiveness is improved, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration suppression effectivenessVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The active control system replaces precision-machined mechanical springs with electronically controlled actuators. The control system achieves precise vibration cancellation through software algorithms and feedback control rather than requiring precisely manufactured mechanical components, significantly reducing manufacturing tolerances and costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the approach from fixed mechanical parameters (spring rates) to adjustable electronic parameters (actuator forces, control gains). This allows the system to adapt to varying operating conditions through software rather than requiring multiple precision-manufactured components for different conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If passive vibration isolators tuned to predetermined frequency are used, then vibration suppression is achieved at specific frequencies, but the device cannot adjust to varying frequencies in different flight regimes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration suppression at predetermined frequencyVSAvoidfrequency adjustment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The active control system transitions from fixed frequency tuning to dynamic frequency adaptation. Sensors detect actual vibration frequencies and the control system continuously adjusts actuator commands to maintain effective suppression across varying frequencies encountered in different flight regimes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements a closed-loop feedback control system where sensors monitor vibration levels and frequencies, and the control system uses this information to adjust actuator commands in real-time. This feedback mechanism enables automatic adaptation to changing vibration characteristics without manual retuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Object-affected harmful factors

If heavy vibration isolators are installed on the rotor system, then vibration suppression is achieved, but the useful payload capacity of the helicopter is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration suppressionVSAvoiduseful payload capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The active control system replaces heavy passive mechanical isolators with lightweight electronic control components including sensors, actuators, and a control computer. This substitution dramatically reduces the weight of the vibration suppression system while maintaining or improving its effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The transition to a dynamic active control system enables the use of much lighter components compared to static mechanical isolators. The system achieves vibration suppression through controlled forces from lightweight actuators rather than relying on the mass and stiffness of heavy mechanical springs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces the weight and cost of vibration suppression while enabling in-flight adjustment to varying frequencies, enhancing the aircraft's lifting capacity and reducing maintenance costs by effectively mitigating vibrations across different flight regimes.

Implementation Method 1

An annular electric motor system defined about an axis of rotation of a rotating system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

independently rotating a multiple of independently rotatable masses disposed about an axis of rotation to reduce in-plane vibration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS8920125B2Dual frequency hub mounted vibration suppressor system
Publication Date: 2014.12.30 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP
  • US8920125B2 patent drawing
  • US8920125B2 patent drawing
  • US8920125B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vibration suppressor system includes an annular electric motor system which independently controls rotation of at least two masses about the axis of rotation to reduce in-plane vibration of the rotating system. A method of reducing vibrations in a rotary-wing aircraft includes independently controlling a relative angular position of a multiple of independently rotatable masses to reduce vibrations of a main rotor system.