Wellbore Annulus Flow Classification for Hole Cleaning Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for monitoring and controlling bottom hole pressure in drilling operations, especially in narrow mud windows and Managed Pressure Drilling, face challenges due to high cuttings concentration and friction losses, which can lead to pressure loss and blockages in the wellbore, requiring improved prediction and estimation of flow patterns and cuttings concentration.

Innovation Solution

The use of dimensionless parameters to classify flow patterns as stationary bed, dispersed, or transitional flows, allowing for accurate modeling of pressure gradients and cuttings concentration, and the implementation of a computing system to estimate and control drilling fluid flow rates based on these classifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the flow rate of the drilling fluid is low, then the concentration of cuttings in the annulus increases, but pressure loss increases due to high cuttings concentration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rateVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using dimensionless parameters (such as the particle Froude number and Reynolds number) to characterize and predict flow patterns. By changing and monitoring these parameters, the system can identify transitions between flow regimes (e.g., from dispersed flow to stationary bed flow) and adjust operating conditions to maintain optimal pressure loss while ensuring effective hole cleaning at different flow rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the flow rate of the drilling fluid is high, then friction loss increases, but pressure loss increases due to high friction effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rateVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring flow rate, pressure loss, and dimensionless parameters to detect changes in flow pattern. This feedback allows the system to adjust the flow rate dynamically to maintain optimal drilling conditions, balancing hole cleaning effectiveness with pressure loss management in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the concentration of cuttings in the annulus is high, then hole cleaning effectiveness improves, but pressure loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehole cleaning effectivenessVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces direct mechanical measurement of cuttings concentration and flow pattern with a field-based approach using dimensionless parameters. By substituting complex mechanical measurements with calculations based on measurable quantities (flow rate, pressure gradient, fluid properties), the system can predict flow patterns and cuttings concentration indirectly, enabling optimization without direct intervention in the flow mechanics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more accurate prediction and control of pressure gradients and cuttings concentration, reducing pressure loss and blockages, thereby enhancing drilling efficiency and safety by considering both hole cleaning and pressure profile jointly.

Implementation Method 1

The flow within such a flow conduit may include multiple phases. The phases include a liquid phase (e.g., drilling fluid) and a particle phase (e.g., cuttings formed by a drill bit of the drill string during drilling)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTwo-phase flow: Two-Phase Flow

Implementation Method 2

Pressure loss in the wellbore may be due to the effects of cuttings and/or friction effects. When the flow rate of the drilling fluid is high, friction loss may become high, which can also lead to high pressure loss

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

The dimensionless parameters include a first dimensionless parameter corresponding to an effect of turbulence on the flow and a second dimensionless parameter corresponding to an effect of gravity on the flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 4

The dimensionless parameters include a first dimensionless parameter corresponding to an effect of turbulence on the flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS11746608B2Method and device for hole cleaning and drilling hydraulic design
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US11746608B2 patent drawing
  • US11746608B2 patent drawing
  • US11746608B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a processor. The processor estimates a pattern of a flow of a mixture of drilling fluid and cuttings in an annulus of a wellbore. The flow is estimated as a stationary bed flow, a dispersed flow, or a transitional flow relative to the stationary bed and dispersed flows. The processor estimates parameters based on the estimated pattern of the flow, and determines a plurality of dimensionless parameters including a first dimensionless parameter corresponding to an effect of turbulence on the flow and a second dimensionless parameter corresponding to an effect of gravity on the flow, based on the estimated parameters. The processor characterizes the pattern of the flow as the stationary bed flow, the dispersed flow, or the transitional flow, based on the dimensionless parameters, and models the flow based on the estimated pattern if it is determined that the characterized pattern matches the estimated pattern.