Anomalous Transaction Detection via Multi-Window ML Transformations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques for detecting money laundering activity are limited by their reliance on short duration moving windows, leading to low discriminative salience and high false positive rates, and can be easily circumvented.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for detecting anomalous activity related to potential fraud or criminal activity among a plurality of transactions, utilizing a machine learning model to apply various transformations such as value weighted netting, maximum frequency weighted netting, equal frequency weighted netting, and funneling weighted netting to identify potentially anomalous activity across linked bank accounts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional techniques use short duration moving windows to detect money laundering, then the detection speed is improved, but the discriminative salience deteriorates and false positive rates increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoiddiscriminative salience
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the transaction monitoring into multiple time windows of different durations (short, medium, long windows) that operate in parallel. Each window captures different temporal patterns of money laundering activity, allowing the system to maintain high detection speed through short windows while improving discriminative salience through longer windows that capture more comprehensive patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds the temporal dimension by analyzing transactions across multiple time scales simultaneously. Instead of using a single time window, the system creates a multi-dimensional temporal analysis structure where short, medium, and long windows provide different perspectives on transaction patterns, enhancing both speed and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If conventional techniques lower the detection threshold to improve sensitivity, then more anomalies are detected, but the number of false positives increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection process into multiple stages corresponding to different time windows. Each window applies its own thresholding logic, and the final detection decision is made by aggregating results across all windows. This segmentation allows the system to be sensitive to various patterns without triggering false positives from any single window.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detection results from different time windows inform each other. The aggregation process uses feedback from multiple windows to adjust the overall detection decision, allowing the system to maintain high sensitivity while filtering out false positives through cross-validation across different temporal scales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If conventional techniques use simple netting rules to improve ease of operation, then the system complexity is reduced, but the ability to detect sophisticated money laundering patterns deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex detection task into simpler sub-tasks handled by different time windows. Each window applies relatively simple netting rules, but the combination of results from multiple windows achieves high detection accuracy for sophisticated patterns without requiring any single window to be overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the results from multiple simple analysis windows to achieve complex detection capabilities. By combining the outputs of short, medium, and long windows, the system achieves high detection accuracy for sophisticated money laundering patterns while maintaining operational simplicity at each individual window level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12217306B2Method for identifying anomalous transactions using machine learning
Publication Date: 2025.02.04 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12217306B2 patent drawing
  • US12217306B2 patent drawing
  • US12217306B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides various transformations to be used in analysis of a large number of transactions to detect anomalies that would indicate potential fraudulent or criminal activity. Such transformations may be applied, for example, using a machine learning system. According to some examples, each of various transformations may be used to detect a particular type of behavioral anomaly. When multiple disparate transformations are considered together by the machine learning system, anomalous activity related to potential fraudulent or criminal activity can be detected more frequently and with greater accuracy.