Anomaly Augmented GAN for False Positive Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anomaly detection methods using generative models struggle to guarantee the correct identification of anomalous data, often resulting in false positives, as they focus on modeling normal data distributions without ensuring effective detection of anomalies.

Innovation Solution

The proposed Anomaly Augmented Generative Adversarial Network (AAGAN) employs a bi-directional GAN with a novel loss function and framework, incorporating a surrogate anomaly distribution and additional discriminators to adversarially train the generator and encoder, ensuring robust anomaly detection by distinguishing between normal and anomalous samples.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If generative models focus on modeling normal data distributions, then the reconstruction capability is improved, but the anomaly detection accuracy deteriorates due to false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training process into two distinct phases: first training the generator on normal data to learn the data distribution, then training a separate discriminator to distinguish normal from anomalous samples. This segmentation allows each component to specialize, improving anomaly detection accuracy while reducing false positives by preventing the generator from overfitting to normal patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The discriminator serves as an intermediary component that mediates between the generator and the anomaly detection task. It provides feedback to the generator about reconstruction quality and introduces anomaly awareness into the training process, enabling the system to detect anomalies accurately without the generator becoming too specialized in normal data reconstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If the generator is trained to reconstruct normal data perfectly, then the representation of normal data is improved, but the ability to detect anomalies deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation loss in reconstructionVSAvoidanomaly detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic training stages where the generator's objective changes over time. In the first stage, the generator focuses on minimizing reconstruction error for normal data. In the second stage, the training dynamics shift as the discriminator is introduced, causing the generator to adapt by learning to produce reconstructions that the discriminator cannot easily distinguish from real normal data, thereby maintaining information fidelity while enabling anomaly detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The training process employs periodic alternation between training the generator and training the discriminator. This periodic action ensures that the generator continuously improves its reconstruction capability while the discriminator simultaneously improves its anomaly detection capability, preventing either objective from completely dominating the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Ease of manufacture

If anomaly detection methods use only normal data for training, then the simplicity of training is improved, but the detection reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining simplicityVSAvoidanomaly detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by first training the generator exclusively on normal data to establish a solid understanding of the data distribution. Only after this preliminary training is complete is the discriminator introduced with anomalous samples. This staged approach maintains training simplicity in the initial phase while ultimately achieving reliable anomaly detection through the subsequent discriminator training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12165067B2Anomaly augmented generative adversarial network
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC FGTL
  • US12165067B2 patent drawing
  • US12165067B2 patent drawing
  • US12165067B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for anomaly detection in accordance with embodiments of the invention are illustrated. One embodiment includes a method for training a system for detecting anomalous samples. The method draws data samples from a data distribution of true samples and an anomaly distribution and draws a latent sample from a latent space. The method further includes steps for training a generator to generate data samples based on the drawn data samples and the latent sample, and training a cyclic discriminator to distinguish between true data samples and reconstructed samples. A reconstructed sample is generated by the generator based on an encoding of a data sample. The method identifies a set of one or more true pairs, a set of one or more anomalous pairs, and a set of one or more generated pairs. The method trains a joint discriminator to distinguish true pairs from anomalous and generated pairs.