Anomaly Characterization Using Joint Historical and Time-Series Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current anomaly detection systems in manufacturing and energy-related fields struggle to distinguish between genuine opportunities for reducing energy or productivity losses and uncontrollable power surges or rapid transient events, leading to inefficient data mining and anomaly characterization.

Innovation Solution

A system that performs a joint historical and time-series analysis using binned inter-quartile range analysis to identify and classify anomalies, differentiating between surge anomalies and steady-state anomalies by calculating the derivative of recent time-series data and comparing it to predetermined thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional anomaly detection methods are used, then all anomalies are detected, but genuine opportunities for reducing energy losses cannot be distinguished from uncontrollable power surges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly characterization accuracyVSAvoidinformation about anomaly type
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments anomalies into different categories (surge anomalies and steady-state anomalies) by analyzing the derivative magnitude of time-series data. This segmentation allows the system to distinguish between controllable and uncontrollable anomalies, enabling targeted remedial actions for genuine energy loss opportunities while ignoring transient power surges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If detailed anomaly analysis is performed on all data points, then accurate anomaly detection is achieved, but system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoiddata mining system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by performing detailed derivative analysis only on identified anomaly points rather than the entire dataset. The system first identifies anomalies using threshold-based detection, then applies localized derivative magnitude analysis only to these specific points to classify them as surge or steady-state anomalies, reducing overall computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If comprehensive anomaly detection is applied, then all outliers are identified, but efficient remedial actions cannot be determined due to lack of anomaly classification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiency improvementVSAvoidinformation about actionable vs. non-actionable anomalies
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the previously harmful or neutral information (derivative magnitude of time-series data) into a beneficial classification mechanism. By analyzing the magnitude of the derivative at anomaly points, the system transforms raw data into meaningful anomaly type classification, enabling users to take targeted remedial actions only on steady-state anomalies while ignoring surge anomalies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS11061915B2System and method for anomaly characterization based on joint historical and time-series analysis
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP
  • US11061915B2 patent drawing
  • US11061915B2 patent drawing
  • US11061915B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment provides a system for facilitating anomaly detection and characterization. During operation, the system determines, by a computing device, a first set of testing data which includes a plurality of data points, wherein the first set includes a data series for a first variable and one or more second variables. The system identifies anomalies by dividing the first set into a number of groups and performing an inter-quartile range analysis on data in each respective group. The system obtains, from the first set, a second set of testing data which includes a data series from a recent time period occurring before a current time, and which further includes a first data point from the identified anomalies. The system classifies the first data point as a first type of anomaly based on whether a magnitude of a derivative of the second set is greater than a first predetermined threshold.