Multi-contextual Anomaly Detection via Model Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anomaly detection systems often fail to provide early warnings effectively, leading to late issue identification and false positive or false negative results due to the massive scale of data analysis, statistical fluctuations, and overfitting models, which can cause undue burden on systems and result in network downtimes or missed anomalies.

Innovation Solution

A system that aggregates outputs from multiple machine learning models trained on different behavioral patterns of a metric, generating an aggregate anomaly score based on seasonality, rare occurrence, and combined metric behaviors, along with a duration score to distinguish real anomalies from statistical fluctuations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single machine learning model is used for anomaly detection, then the system complexity is low, but the detection accuracy is reduced due to false positives and negatives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the anomaly detection task into multiple specialized machine learning models, each trained to detect specific types of anomalies or patterns. Instead of using one general model, the system segments the detection function across multiple models that can be selectively applied based on the data characteristics, thereby improving detection accuracy while managing complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal anomaly detection system that can handle multiple types of anomalies through a single framework. The system uses a common infrastructure with multiple machine learning models that can be configured for different detection scenarios, making the system adaptable to various anomaly types without requiring separate dedicated systems for each case

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of time

If the detection system is tuned to be more sensitive, then early anomaly detection is improved, but false positive warnings increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection timeVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic thresholding and model selection mechanisms that adjust the sensitivity of anomaly detection based on current data conditions. The system can dynamically select which machine learning models to apply and adjust detection thresholds in real-time, allowing early detection when appropriate while reducing false positives when data patterns suggest normal variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detection results and system performance are continuously monitored. This feedback is used to refine model parameters, adjust sensitivity thresholds, and improve the distinction between true anomalies and false positives over time, thereby maintaining early detection capability while reducing false alarm rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the detection system is tuned to be more restrictive, then false positive warnings are reduced, but false negative reporting increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse positive rateVSAvoidanomaly detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the detection function across multiple specialized models, the system can apply different sensitivity levels to different anomaly types. Restrictive tuning for one model does not necessarily affect others, allowing the system to maintain high reliability for common anomalies while preserving detection capability for rare but critical events through appropriate model selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If multiple machine learning models are used for anomaly detection, then detection accuracy is improved, but the computational burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the computational workload across multiple specialized models rather than using one comprehensive model. This segmentation allows for more efficient computation by applying only the necessary models to specific data types, reducing overall computational burden while maintaining high detection accuracy through targeted analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes parameters such as model selection, data sampling rates, and detection thresholds based on current computational conditions and data characteristics. This allows the system to adjust its computational intensity to match available resources while maintaining effective anomaly detection through adaptive parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240036963A1Multi-contextual anomaly detection
Publication Date: 2024.02.01 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
  • US20240036963A1 patent drawing
  • US20240036963A1 patent drawing
  • US20240036963A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to systems and methods of detecting anomalies using a plurality of machine learning models. Each of the machine learning models may be trained to detect a respective behavior of historical data values for a given metric. Thus, a system may perform anomaly detection based on different behaviors of the same metric of data, reducing instances of false positive anomaly detection while also reducing instances of false negative reporting. The plurality of machine learning models may be trained to detect anomalies across multiple different types of metrics as well, providing robust multi-metric anomaly detection across a range of behaviors of historical data values. The system may implement a pluggable architecture for the plurality of machine learning models in which models may be added or removed from pluggable architecture. In this way, the system may detect anomalies using a configurable set of machine learning models.