Anomaly Detection Event Handling via Randomized Logging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing intrusion detection systems in motor vehicles face challenges in efficiently handling anomalies without overloading the system, ensuring data integrity, and preventing unauthorized manipulation or deletion of logging entries.

Innovation Solution

A method where the decision to further process, store, or reduce events is made randomly, ensuring nondeterministic behavior and reducing the number of events to simplify processing. This involves using vehicle-specific random numbers to select events, storing them in memory, and adjusting the selection based on memory fill state to prevent overflow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all detected anomalies are stored and processed, then complete logging coverage is achieved, but system overload and memory overflow occur under high event rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogging completenessVSAvoidsystem processing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by randomly selecting only a subset of detected anomalies for storage and processing. Instead of handling all anomalies deterministically, the logger uses probabilistic sampling to process approximately 10% of events, thereby reducing processing load while maintaining representative logging coverage. This resolves the contradiction by accepting partial logging in exchange for system stability under high event rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Ease of operation

If deterministic logging behavior is used, then predictable processing is achieved, but intrusion patterns become detectable and manipulable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing predictabilityVSAvoidintrusion detection security
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from deterministic to dynamic behavior by introducing randomness into the logging selection process. The logger dynamically decides which anomalies to store based on random probability rather than fixed rules, making the logging pattern unpredictable to intruders. This dynamic approach maintains processing simplicity while enhancing security by preventing pattern recognition and manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Quantity of substance

If memory buffering is increased to handle high event rates, then logging capacity is improved, but memory overflow risk increases under prolonged intrusions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory storage capacityVSAvoidmemory overflow prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by storing only a random subset of anomalies rather than buffering all detected events. This probabilistic sampling approach limits memory usage to approximately 10% of the total event volume, preventing memory overflow under prolonged intrusions while maintaining representative logging coverage. The trade-off accepts partial data loss in exchange for memory stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12216562B2Method for handling an anomaly of data, in particular in a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.02.04 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US12216562B2 patent drawing
  • US12216562B2 patent drawing
  • US12216562B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for handling an anomaly of data, in particular in a motor vehicle. At least one sensor obtains data for the anomaly detection. The sensor examines the obtained data for anomalies, and generates an event as a function of the associated data when an anomaly is detected. It is decided whether the event is further processed, in particular stored and/or further communicated, at least in part.