Anomaly Detection Engine Using Reinforcement Learning for Zero-Day Attacks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional anomaly detection systems in networks face challenges such as dataset constraints, high computation time, complexity, reduced accuracy, inadequate decision-making, and ambiguity in analyzing patterns, particularly in detecting sophisticated intrusions and zero-day attacks, which are not addressed by supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing reinforcement learning to extract feature values from datasets associated with anomaly classes, determining a generic pattern of behavior, and updating it based on performance analysis, enabling real-time detection of anomalous behavior patterns without requiring specific signatures and minimizing user intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If supervised or unsupervised machine learning techniques are used for anomaly detection, then the system can classify known attack patterns, but the system suffers from high computation time and cannot detect zero-day attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-processes and stores normal network behavior patterns during offline training phases, creating baseline models in advance. During real-time operation, the system compares incoming traffic against these pre-established baselines rather than performing full analysis, significantly reducing computation time while maintaining detection accuracy for both known and unknown attacks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts its detection thresholds and parameters based on the current network state and traffic characteristics. It adjusts sensitivity levels, time windows, and analysis depth according to real-time conditions, allowing faster processing during normal operations while maintaining high detection accuracy when anomalies are detected

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional anomaly detection systems are trained based on historic data, then they can identify known attack patterns, but they are unable to identify new attack patterns or zero-day attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattack pattern recognitionVSAvoidnew attack detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors network traffic and feeds detected patterns back into its learning mechanism. When new anomaly types are detected, the system updates its models and expands its knowledge base, enabling it to adapt to emerging threats. This closed-loop feedback allows the system to evolve from detecting only known attacks to identifying zero-day threats through pattern recognition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-learning and automatic model updates without requiring manual retraining or intervention. It autonomously analyzes new traffic patterns, identifies deviations from normal behavior, and adapts its detection capabilities continuously, enabling it to detect new attack types as they emerge in the network environment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If anomaly detection systems monitor all network traffic in detail, then detection accuracy improves, but system complexity and computation requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments network traffic into different categories and applies specialized detection methods to each segment. It divides traffic into normal and anomalous streams, further categorizing anomalies by type and severity. This segmentation allows detailed analysis of suspicious traffic while using simplified monitoring for normal traffic, maintaining high detection accuracy without proportionally increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies full-depth analysis only to traffic that exhibits suspicious characteristics, while using lightweight monitoring for the majority of normal traffic. It performs partial analysis on borderline cases and excessive (detailed) analysis only when necessary, optimizing the balance between detection precision and system complexity by concentrating computational resources where they are most needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11496495B2System and a method for detecting anomalous patterns in a network
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT LTD
  • US11496495B2 patent drawing
  • US11496495B2 patent drawing
  • US11496495B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses a system and a method for detecting anomalous patterns in a network such as a LAN, WAN, MAN, internet of things (Iot), cloud networks, or any other network. In operation, the system and method of the present invention determines a generic pattern of behavior associated with a plurality of anomaly classes based on a plurality of feature values using reinforcement learning technique. The generic pattern is fixed as a boundary for each of the plurality of anomaly classes and is representative of behavior which substantially simulates the network behavior on attack by any of the plurality of anomaly classes. Further, the present invention, provides for updating the generic pattern using reinforcement learning. The updated generic pattern is implemented to analyze and detect anomalous behavior in the incoming network traffic in real time.