Anomaly Detection Supervisor Model for IT Environment Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack an accurate way to monitor the performance of anomaly detection models in IT environments and detect data drift, leading to potential security breaches and system problems due to underperforming models.

Innovation Solution

A system that retrieves current system data and anomaly detection model outputs, processing them with a trained anomaly detection supervisor model to provide performance data. This model adjusts the anomaly detection model when performance falls below a threshold.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If anomaly detection models are continuously trained to maintain high performance, then model accuracy is improved, but training time and computational resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection model accuracyVSAvoidmodel training time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring of data drift and performance degradation trends before they reach critical thresholds. By detecting early signs of model deterioration through continuous evaluation of input data distribution changes, the system can schedule retraining proactively rather than reactively, optimizing the timing of resource-intensive training operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where model performance metrics and data drift measurements are continuously fed back to the training management mechanism. This feedback enables dynamic adjustment of retraining schedules, allowing the system to train models more frequently when drift is detected and less frequently when the model remains accurate, thereby optimizing the balance between reliability and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If anomaly detection models are retrained frequently to adapt to changing system data, then model performance is maintained, but computational resources and training costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel adaptability to data driftVSAvoidcomputational resources for training
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the retraining frequency and resource allocation based on real-time monitoring of data drift metrics and performance degradation. When the system detects significant changes in input data distribution, it automatically increases training frequency; when data remains stable, it reduces training activities. This dynamic adaptation optimizes the balance between model adaptability and computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors changes in data distribution parameters and model performance metrics to determine when retraining is necessary. By tracking specific parameters such as data drift magnitude, anomaly detection accuracy, and false positive rates, the system can make informed decisions about retraining timing, avoiding unnecessary training operations and conserving computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If anomaly detection models are not retrained when needed, then training resources are saved, but model performance degrades leading to security breaches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining resource consumptionVSAvoidsecurity breaches and system problems
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of data drift and performance degradation trends before they lead to critical failures or security breaches. By continuously monitoring input data distribution changes and model performance metrics, the system can identify early warning signs and trigger retraining operations proactively, preventing the model from reaching a state where it would fail to detect anomalies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback monitoring of model performance and data drift, automatically triggering retraining when thresholds are exceeded. This feedback mechanism ensures that the model is retrained promptly when performance degradation is detected, preventing security breaches while avoiding unnecessary training when the model remains effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12309173B2Performance monitoring in the anomaly detection domain for the IT environment
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12309173B2 patent drawing
  • US12309173B2 patent drawing
  • US12309173B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach is disclosed that retrieves a set of current system data corresponding to a computer system and a set of current outputs from an anomaly detection model that is monitoring the computer system. The current system data and the anomaly detection model outputs are input to a trained anomaly detection supervisor model. The trained anomaly detection supervisor model processes the inputs and provides a set of performance data corresponding to the anomaly detection model. The anomaly detection model is then adjusted when the set of performance data indicates that the anomaly detection model is performing below a threshold.