Anomaly Detection in Telephone Network Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fraud detection systems in telephone networks rely on static rules and struggle to identify sophisticated and evolving fraudulent activities, such as PBX hacking and Wangiri fraud, resulting in significant financial losses for carriers.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based approach using a combination of the Isolation Forest and ODMAD algorithms to analyze call patterns, incorporating both categorical and continuous features, to detect anomalous behavior in real-time and adapt to changing network usage patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If static rules with fixed thresholds are used for fraud detection, then the system is simple to implement and maintain, but it cannot identify sophisticated and evolving fraudulent activities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to detect evolving fraud patternsVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from static fraud detection rules to dynamic machine learning models that continuously adapt to new fraud patterns. The system uses algorithms like Isolation Forest and One-Class SVM that can dynamically adjust to evolving fraudulent behaviors without requiring manual rule updates, thereby resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the detection system by moving from fixed threshold parameters to learned parameters from training data. The machine learning models learn optimal detection parameters from historical data, enabling the system to adapt to new fraud patterns while maintaining a manageable complexity through automated parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If machine learning algorithms are used to improve fraud detection accuracy, then classification accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud classification accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and applies specialized anomaly detection algorithms (Isolation Forest, One-Class SVM) that are designed specifically for fraud detection tasks. These algorithms focus computational resources on the most relevant features and patterns, achieving high accuracy while managing complexity through algorithm specialization rather than general-purpose complex models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the fraud detection problem into distinct algorithmic components: feature extraction, anomaly scoring, and classification. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, improving overall accuracy while keeping individual module complexities manageable and interpretable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive feature analysis is performed to improve detection accuracy, then fraud identification improves, but processing speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidreal-time processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using feature selection techniques that identify and process only the most discriminative features for fraud detection. Rather than analyzing all possible features, the system focuses on a subset of critical features, maintaining high detection accuracy while reducing computational load to enable real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action through offline feature engineering and model training phases where comprehensive feature analysis is conducted. The trained models then apply this pre-computed knowledge during real-time detection, allowing thorough analysis during training but fast processing during actual fraud detection operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10045218B1Anomaly detection in streaming telephone network data
Publication Date: 2018.08.07 ARGYLE DATA
  • US10045218B1 patent drawing
  • US10045218B1 patent drawing
  • US10045218B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one example, a method includes receiving a feature vector that characterizes a call history for a telephone network subscriber, wherein the feature vector comprises respective categorical values for one or more categorical features and respective continuous values for one or more continuous features, and applying, to the categorical values, a first algorithm to determine a categorical score for the feature vector. The example method further includes applying, to the continuous values, an isolation forest algorithm to determine a continuous score for the feature vector, and outputting, in response to determining at least one of the categorical score for the feature vector and the continuous score for the feature vector indicate the feature vector is anomalous, an indication that the feature vector is anomalous.