Anonymization Server Redacting Non-Facial Features

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image anonymization techniques, such as facial feature redaction, may not be sufficient to preserve anonymity when non-facial features in publicly available images match those in redacted images, potentially compromising identity privacy.

Innovation Solution

An anonymization server analyzes both redacted and unredacted images to identify matching facial and non-facial features, and redacts additional non-facial features in the redacted image only if they match those in publicly accessible images, ensuring anonymity is maintained.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If only facial features are redacted in the image, then the anonymization process is simple and preserves most image information, but the anonymity may be compromised when non-facial features in publicly available images match those in redacted images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage informationVSAvoidanonymity protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by searching for publicly available images containing the same person before finalizing the redaction. This advance action allows the system to identify matching non-facial features and adjust the redaction strategy accordingly, preventing anonymity compromise while minimizing information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different redaction levels to different regions of the image based on local risk assessment. Facial features receive standard redaction, while specific non-facial features (such as tattoos, scars, or distinctive clothing) are selectively redacted only when they match features in publicly available images, preserving other informative regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If non-facial features are redacted in the redacted image to maintain anonymity, then anonymity protection is improved, but more image information is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanonymity protectionVSAvoidimage information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies differential redaction strategies to different image regions. High-risk non-facial features that match publicly available images are redacted, while other non-facial features are preserved. This selective approach maintains anonymity protection where needed while minimizing overall information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial redaction of non-facial features only to the extent necessary for anonymity protection. Rather than redacting all non-facial features, it selectively redacts only those features that create anonymity risks, preserving the rest of the image information for investigative or record purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the system searches and compares multiple publicly available images to ensure anonymity, then anonymity protection is strengthened, but the processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanonymity protectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs image search and comparison operations as a preliminary step before generating the final redacted image. This structured approach organizes the complexity into manageable stages: searching for publicly available images, extracting features, comparing features, and then applying appropriate redaction, making the complex process more systematic and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts specific features (facial and non-facial) from both the input image and publicly available images for comparison. By isolating and comparing only the relevant identifying features rather than analyzing entire images, the system reduces computational complexity while maintaining effective anonymity protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If the system redacts additional non-facial features, then anonymity is better preserved, but the number of processing steps increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanonymity protectionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system identifies and marks non-facial features requiring redaction during the preliminary image analysis phase, before the actual redaction process. This advance identification allows for efficient batch processing of redaction operations, reducing the time required during the final image generation stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines the analysis of facial and non-facial features into a unified redaction process. Rather than separately processing facial redaction and then non-facial redaction as distinct time-consuming steps, the system integrates both analyses and applies redactions in a coordinated manner, reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12039082B2System and method for anonymizing a person captured in an image
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
  • US12039082B2 patent drawing
  • US12039082B2 patent drawing
  • US12039082B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process of anonymizing a person captured in an image. An anonymization server receives a request from an agency to anonymize a person captured in an image including an unredacted facial feature corresponding to the person and an unredacted non-facial feature. The server redacts the facial feature captured in the image to generate a first redacted image. The server then identifies a second image accessible to users not associated with the agency. When the server determines that the anonymity of the person captured in the first redacted image can be compromised using unredacted facial and non-facial features captured in the second image, the server further redacts the non-facial feature captured in the image.