Antenna Array Phase Calibration via Feedback Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, especially in 5G and anticipated 6G, high-frequency operations face challenges with increased path loss, leading to degraded cell sizes and capacities due to limited beam isolation and interference, which existing analog beamforming technologies struggle to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using feedback signals like SINR or CQI measurements from wireless communication devices to iteratively calibrate phase values in antenna arrays, optimizing beamforming settings to enhance signal transmission power and reduce interference, allowing for improved beam quality and capacity without requiring new feedback signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If analog beamforming is used to increase beam gain and restore EIRP rating, then path loss is mitigated and cell coverage is improved, but beam isolation is limited and interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath lossVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback signals (CQI, SINR measurements) from wireless communication devices to iteratively optimize beamforming phase values. The base station transmits reference signals, receives quality measurements from devices, and adjusts phase values to maximize signal quality while minimizing interference. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables dynamic adaptation of beamforming parameters to achieve both high beam gain and adequate beam isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static beamforming (fixed phase values) to dynamic beamforming where phase values are continuously optimized based on real-time feedback. The system iteratively adjusts phase values across multiple iterations, adapting to changing channel conditions and device positions. This dynamic optimization enables the system to maintain optimal beam gain while adapting beam direction and shape to reduce interference with other users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Power

If all antenna branches are used to maximize EIRP and sensitivity, then transmission power is increased, but beam isolation deteriorates and interference from other beams increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEIRPVSAvoidbeam interference
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes phase values as key parameters to achieve optimal balance between EIRP and beam isolation. By iteratively adjusting phase values based on feedback measurements, the system finds optimal phase configurations that maximize main beam gain while suppressing sidelobes and reducing interference. The patent also explores amplitude adjustments in some embodiments to further optimize the trade-off between total radiated power and spatial isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different phase values to different antenna branches to create directed beams with specific spatial characteristics. Instead of uniform phase distribution, the system tailors the phase profile locally at each antenna element to achieve focused main beams and suppressed sidelobes in specific directions. This local optimization of phase quality enables high EIRP in desired directions while minimizing interference in other directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-generated harmful factors

If beamforming accuracy is increased to reduce sidelobe levels, then beam isolation is improved, but EIRP loss increases due to tapering requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesidelobe interferenceVSAvoidEIRP loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback measurements of actual received signal quality (CQI, SINR) to evaluate the true impact of beamforming configurations on system performance. Rather than relying on theoretical sidelobe calculations, the system measures actual interference and signal quality at the receiving device. This enables optimization of phase values to achieve adequate beam isolation without excessive tapering that would cause EIRP loss, as the feedback reveals the actual performance impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies iterative optimization that gradually refines phase values to achieve sufficient but not excessive beam isolation. The system performs multiple iterations with progressively improved phase configurations, stopping when performance gains diminish. This partial action approach achieves adequate sidelobe suppression for practical interference reduction without the excessive tapering that would cause significant EIRP loss, optimizing the trade-off based on actual system requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240284351A1System and method for optimizing transmission power of antenna array by using feedback signal
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20240284351A1 patent drawing
  • US20240284351A1 patent drawing
  • US20240284351A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Optimizing transmission powers of antenna arrays in base stations by using feedback signals from multiple wireless communication devices. A method performed by the base stations includes identifying a first served wireless communication device and a second served wireless communication device; transmitting a first signal to the first served wireless communication device via the antenna array with a first initial set of phase values and a second signal to the second served wireless communication device via the antenna array with a second initial set of phase values; receiving a first measurement of the first signal from the first served wireless communication device and a second measurement of the second signal from the second served wireless communication device; and performing a calibration procedure based on the first measurement to provide a first calibrated set of phase values and the second measurement to provide a second calibrated set of phase values.