Antenna Interference Mitigation via Dynamic TDM-FDM Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In communication devices with limited hardware design space, such as mobile phones and set-top boxes, insufficient isolation between antennas leads to significant interference between different wireless communication systems, hindering maximum throughput performance.

Innovation Solution

A method and device for communication that determine whether mutual interference between antennas exceeds a preset threshold, and if so, employ a Time-Division Multiplexing (TDM) mode to avoid interference, while allowing Frequency-Division Multiplexing (FDM) when interference is below the threshold to achieve maximum throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sufficient hardware isolation between antennas is ensured, then interference between different wireless communication systems is avoided and maximum throughput performance is achieved, but hardware design space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput performanceVSAvoidhardware design space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic antenna mode switching between TDM and FDM based on real-time interference detection. The system transitions from static hardware isolation to dynamic operational mode adaptation, allowing the same hardware configuration to achieve both high throughput and interference mitigation by adjusting the multiplexing mode according to actual interference conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (time division vs frequency division multiplexing) to resolve interference issues. By detecting interference levels and switching between TDM and FDM modes, the system adapts parameter configurations to maintain throughput performance without requiring increased hardware isolation space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Area of stationary object

If hardware isolation between antennas is reduced to save design space, then device compactness is improved, but interference between different wireless communication systems increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware design spaceVSAvoidinterference between wireless communication systems
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful interference effect into a useful detection signal. By monitoring interference levels between antennas, the system identifies when TDM mode should be activated. The interference that would normally degrade performance is instead used as a trigger mechanism to switch to the appropriate multiplexing mode, thereby eliminating the harmful effect while maintaining compact hardware design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where interference detection results directly control the antenna multiplexing mode selection. The detected interference level feeds back to the control logic, which then adjusts the operational mode (TDM or FDM) to eliminate or mitigate the interference, creating a closed-loop system that maintains performance in compact hardware configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12341545B2Method and device for communication, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.06.24 SPREADTRUM COMMUNICATION (SHANGHAI) CO LTD
  • US12341545B2 patent drawing
  • US12341545B2 patent drawing
  • US12341545B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a method and device for communication and an electronic device. The method includes: determining whether impact of mutual interference between a first antenna and a second antenna on wireless signal transceiving of the first antenna and the second antenna exceeds a preset interference upper limit; and in response to a determination that the impact of the mutual interference between the first antenna and the second antenna on the wireless signal transceiving of the first antenna and the second antenna exceeds the preset interference upper limit, transceiving the first-mode wireless signal through the first antenna and transceiving the second-mode wireless signal through the second antenna. Transceiving of the first-mode wireless signal through the first antenna and transceiving of the second-mode wireless signal through the second antenna are performed in a time-division multiplexing (TDM) mode.