Antenna With Progressive Gap For Gain Size Tradeoff

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication antennas face a challenge in miniaturization as they tend to lose gain when their size is reduced, making it difficult to achieve both small size and high performance, especially in high-frequency bands above 10 GHz.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a unique antenna structure with a first and second conductor portion separated by a gap whose width progressively increases, connected by a third conductor portion, allowing for adjustable frequency characteristics and improved gain even at smaller sizes by altering the size of the antenna.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the antenna size is reduced to achieve miniaturization, then the device size is reduced, but the antenna gain decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantenna sizeVSAvoidantenna gain
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The antenna is divided into multiple conductor portions (first, second, and third conductor portions) separated by gaps. This segmentation allows the antenna to achieve resonant characteristics at desired frequencies while maintaining a compact overall size, resolving the contradiction between miniaturization and gain maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gap width is designed to vary progressively along the antenna structure, creating different local electromagnetic properties. This non-uniform gap configuration optimizes the current distribution and impedance characteristics locally, enabling high gain in a small overall antenna structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Volume of moving object

If the antenna size is reduced, then the device becomes more compact, but the signal transmission efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantenna sizeVSAvoidsignal transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The antenna structure incorporates variable gap widths that create dynamic current distribution patterns. The progressive gap width variation optimizes the electromagnetic field confinement and reduces energy loss, maintaining high transmission efficiency despite the reduced antenna size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the gap width is increased to adjust frequency characteristics, then the impedance is adjusted, but the antenna size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency characteristic adjustabilityVSAvoidantenna size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Different sections of the antenna have different gap widths, allowing independent optimization of frequency characteristics in each section. This local variation enables precise impedance and frequency tuning without requiring an overall increase in antenna dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11011846B2Antenna and semiconductor device with improved tradeoff relationship between antenna gain and antenna size
Publication Date: 2021.05.18 LAPIS SEMICON CO LTD
  • US11011846B2 patent drawing
  • US11011846B2 patent drawing
  • US11011846B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An antenna including: a first conductor portion including a power supply point at which one of a pair of differential signals is input; a second conductor portion including a power supply point at which another one of the pair of differential signals is input, the second conductor portion being separated by a gap from the first conductor portion; and a third conductor portion that connects the first conductor portion with the second conductor portion, wherein the gap includes a portion having a width that becomes progressively wider in a direction moving away from the third conductor portion.