Antenna Selection Using Frequency-Hopped Sounding Reference Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current antenna selection methods in wireless communication networks, particularly in LTE systems, face challenges in efficiently estimating channels using frequency-hopped sounding reference signals, especially when transceivers are moving rapidly, leading to outdated channel estimates and limited performance improvement.

Innovation Solution

The method involves transmitting frequency-hopped sounding reference signals alternately from subsets of antennas, with a predetermined pattern that adjusts based on the number of subbands and subsets, ensuring that channel estimates are updated periodically and covering the entire bandwidth effectively, thereby improving antenna selection accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If frequency-hopped sounding reference signals are used for antenna selection, then channel estimation can be performed across the entire bandwidth, but the channel estimates become outdated when transceivers are moving rapidly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth coverageVSAvoidchannel estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by transmitting frequency-hopped sounding reference signals in periodic intervals rather than continuously. The sounding reference signals are transmitted periodically across different frequency subbands, allowing the system to balance between bandwidth coverage and maintaining current channel estimate validity. This periodic transmission reduces the time delay between channel estimation updates while still covering the entire bandwidth over multiple periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Measurement precision

If channel estimates are updated frequently to track rapid movements, then estimation accuracy improves, but the signaling overhead and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel estimation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the bandwidth into multiple subbands and assigns different antenna subsets to different subbands for transmitting frequency-hopped sounding reference signals. This segmentation allows parallel channel estimation across multiple subbands, reducing the overall processing complexity while maintaining accurate channel estimates. Each antenna subset handles a specific subband, distributing the processing load and enabling efficient tracking of rapid channel changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by transmitting sounding reference signals from only a subset of antennas at any given time rather than all antennas simultaneously. Different antenna subsets are activated in different time intervals or frequency subbands, reducing the processing complexity and signaling overhead while still achieving comprehensive channel estimation through the frequency-hopping pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If antenna selection is performed to reduce hardware complexity, then the number of RF chains is reduced, but the system performance degrades compared to full MIMO

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware complexityVSAvoidsystem capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing adaptive antenna selection where the subset of antennas is not fixed but dynamically selected based on current channel conditions. The system periodically updates the antenna subset configuration using frequency-hopped sounding reference signals to track channel variations, allowing the antenna selection to adapt to changing environmental conditions and maintain system capacity close to full MIMO performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by varying the antenna subset configuration and frequency hopping patterns based on channel quality indicators. The system adjusts which antennas are active and how frequency resources are allocated across different antenna subsets, optimizing the balance between hardware complexity reduction and maintaining system capacity through parameter adaptation rather than fixed configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2294718B1Wireless communication network and method for antenna selection in wireless communication network
Publication Date: 2019.07.03 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • EP2294718B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2294718B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2294718B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention describe a method for antenna selection (AS) in a wireless communication network. The network includes a base station and a transceiver, wherein the transceiver has a set of antennas, and wherein the transceiver is configured to transmit a frequency-hopped sounding reference signal (SRS) from a subset of antennas at a time. The base station determines a type of a training transmission based on a number of the subbands and a number of subsets in the set of antennas, and transmits an instruction including the type to the transceiver.