Antenna Switching Circuitry for LTE MIMO Diversity Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

RF front-end modules face challenges in adapting to the increasing demand for higher data rates and multiple RF communication standards, particularly with LTE diversity and MIMO specifications, due to complex routing requirements and high-frequency signal handling.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of antenna switching circuitry using multiple throw solid-state transistor switches (MTSTS) and microelectromechanical switches (MTMEMS) with a control circuit, allowing for flexible and efficient routing of RF signals across multiple antennas and transceiver chains, compliant with LTE diversity and MIMO specifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple throw solid-state transistor switches and microelectromechanical switches are used for antenna switching, then isolation and insertion loss performance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveisolation and insertion loss performanceVSAvoidswitching circuitry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The antenna switching circuit is divided into multiple independent switching modules (solid-state transistor switches and microelectromechanical switches), each handling specific signal paths. This segmentation allows each switch type to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Control circuitry acts as an intermediary between the antenna elements and the transceiver chains, intelligently routing signals through the appropriate switching paths. The control circuitry coordinates the operation of multiple switches to achieve the desired isolation and insertion loss characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If adaptable RF front-end circuitry is designed to handle LTE diversity and MIMO specifications, then adaptability is improved, but routing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with LTE diversity and MIMO specificationsVSAvoidrouting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The RF front-end circuitry is designed with universal switching capabilities that can accommodate multiple communication standards and modes (LTE diversity, MIMO, carrier aggregation). The same hardware infrastructure supports different operational modes through reconfigurable switching paths controlled by the control circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The routing configuration is made dynamic and reconfigurable, allowing the system to adapt to different LTE specifications and operational modes. The control circuitry dynamically adjusts the switching paths based on the required communication standard and signal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If high-frequency RF signals are routed through multiple switches, then signal handling capability is improved, but insertion loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh-frequency signal handling capabilityVSAvoidinsertion loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Different switch types are deployed in different locations within the signal path based on their specific characteristics. Solid-state transistor switches are used where low insertion loss is critical, while microelectromechanical switches are used where high isolation is required. This local optimization minimizes overall insertion loss while maintaining signal handling capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (switching states, signal paths) to optimize performance for different signal conditions. The control circuitry selects paths that minimize insertion loss for high-frequency signals while maintaining the required isolation and signal handling capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10298288B2Antenna switching circuitry for MIMO/diversity modes
Publication Date: 2019.05.21 QORVO US INC
  • US10298288B2 patent drawing
  • US10298288B2 patent drawing
  • US10298288B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to antenna switching circuitry and other radio frequency (RF) front-end circuitry. In one embodiment, the antenna switching circuitry includes a multiple throw solid-state transistor switch (MTSTS), a multiple throw microelectromechanical switch (MTMEMS), and a control circuit. The MTSTS is configured to selectively couple a first pole port to any one of a first set of throw ports and to selectively couple a second pole port to any one of a second set of throw ports. The MTMEMS is configured to selectively couple a third pole port to any one of a third set of throw ports. The control circuit is configured to control the selective coupling of the MTSTS and the MTMEMS. In this manner, the control circuit may operate the antenna switching circuitry so that RF signals may be routed in accordance with Long Term Evolution (LTE) Multiple-Input and Multiple-Output (MIMO) and/or LTE diversity specifications.