Anti-Backbending Roller Frame Assembly for Track Deflection Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ground-engaging track systems in off-highway equipment experience uneven wear and deflection, particularly in harsh operating conditions, leading to backbending of track sections that negatively impact ride and performance.

Innovation Solution

Incorporation of inboard and outboard anti-backbending rollers supported by the track roller frame, with freely rotatable shells and radially projecting flanges to limit lateral displacement and oppose backbending, creating an idler space for the idler to move within.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the track system uses robust and serviceable components to withstand harsh operating conditions, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrack system reliabilityVSAvoidtrack system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The track system is divided into modular components including track links, track shoes, rollers, and idlers that can be independently serviced and replaced. The anti-backbending mechanism is integrated as a distinct functional element within the roller frame assembly, allowing targeted maintenance without complete system replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The idler is designed with recoil capability, allowing it to move dynamically in response to terrain variations and track tension changes. This dynamic adjustment maintains optimal track tension and contact without requiring complex active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the track system operates on uneven substrates, then adaptability is improved, but backbending of track sections occurs degrading ride quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain adaptabilityVSAvoidtrack section stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The anti-backbending rollers are positioned to preemptively counteract the backbending force before it can significantly degrade ride quality. These rollers apply opposing force to track sections that tend to backbend on uneven terrain, maintaining track stability without restricting the system's ability to adapt to terrain variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Ease of operation

If the idler is allowed to move freely in fore-aft directions, then ease of operation is improved, but lateral displacement of the track occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidler movement flexibilityVSAvoidtrack lateral stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The anti-backbending rollers incorporate asymmetric features with different properties in different directions: they provide resistance to lateral displacement while allowing fore-aft movement. This directional differentiation enables the idler to move freely along the track length while maintaining lateral track stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4237316B1Roller frame assembly in ground-engaging track system having Anti-backbending rollers and method
Publication Date: 2025.12.17 CATERPILLAR INC
  • EP4237316B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4237316B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4237316B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A ground-engaging track system (14) includes a track roller frame (16), an idler (28), and anti-backbending rollers (52,54) supported by the track roller frame (16) at locations between track rollers (50) and the idler (28). The anti-backbending rollers (52,54) define an idler space (56) receiving the idler (28) partially therein and positioned to oppose backbending of a deflection-sensitive section (118) of a ground-engaging track (38).