Anti-Counterfeiting Object With Composite X-Ray Signatures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anti-counterfeiting technologies, such as X-ray diffraction methods, are vulnerable to reproduction due to the ease of analyzing and replicating crystalline materials, and require rigorous manufacturing processes to maintain homogeneity and unique signatures, while also being covert and database-dependent.

Innovation Solution

An anti-counterfeiting object with an optical identification marking and an authentication volume comprising an immiscible mixture of materials with distinct X-ray diffraction signatures, allowing for a composite signature that is unique and resistant to reproduction, using additive manufacturing to control material distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional X-ray diffraction analysis is used to authenticate objects, then the authentication method is readable and identifiable, but the method becomes vulnerable to reproduction and counterfeiting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication securityVSAvoidease of analysis and replication
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite authentication material comprising at least one amorphous phase, at least one crystalline phase, and at least one complex metallic phase. This multi-phase composite creates a unique X-ray diffraction pattern that is difficult to replicate because the combination of phases produces a complex signature that cannot be easily analyzed or reproduced by conventional means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical and chemical parameters of the authentication material by incorporating multiple phases (amorphous, crystalline, and complex metallic) in specific proportions. This creates a material with unique X-ray diffraction characteristics that differ fundamentally from conventional single-phase materials, making the authentication more secure while remaining detectable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If rigorous manufacturing processes are used to maintain homogeneity and unique signatures, then the authentication reliability is improved, but the manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignature uniquenessVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent prepares the authentication material with a predetermined composition and phase distribution before manufacturing the final product. By establishing the unique multi-phase composition in advance and incorporating it into the product during manufacturing, the system ensures signature uniqueness without requiring complex post-manufacturing processes or rigorous quality control during production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If covert authentication methods are used, then the security is improved, but the ease of operation and identification is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidvisual identification
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the authentication system into two distinct components: a covert authentication material embedded within the product for secure X-ray diffraction analysis, and an overt visual identification marking on the product surface for easy visual recognition. This segmentation allows the system to simultaneously provide both security through covert methods and ease of operation through visual identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a secure, cost-effective, and visually identifiable anti-counterfeiting method that reduces the need for database access, ensuring authentication through a composite X-ray diffraction signature that is difficult to replicate, while minimizing material costs.

Implementation Method 1

authentication material that comprises at least one amorphous phase, at least one crystalline phase and at least one complex metallic phase. Indeed, such an authentication substance produces, by X-ray crystallography analysis, a unique diffraction pattern, forming a unique signature, or fingerprint

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray diffraction: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

WO 2019/011986 presents an authentication method using X-ray crystallography, which is more secure than that described in US 2007/0121181

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray crystallography: X-Ray

Data Source

PatentEP3999354B1Anti-counterfeiting object
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 CENT NAT DE LA RECH SCI (C N R S)
  • EP3999354B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3999354B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3999354B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to an anti-counterfeiting object comprising a face (12) with an optical identification marking (14) which is readable by the eye and/or by a machine, and an authentication volume, the authentication volume extending from the face (12) in the thickness (z) direction so as to be accessible from the face (12) in order to be read by X-ray diffractometry (XRD). The authentication volume is a composite of a first material, referred to as the authentication material, and at least one second material, the authentication volume constituting a material volume of at least 5 mm3. The authentication material comprises at least one amorphous phase, at least one crystalline phase and at least one complex metal phase. The second material is typically a polymer. The invention may advantageously be implemented by 3D printing.