Anti-HVEM Antibody Promoting LIGHT Binding for Solid Tumors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current anti-HVEM antibodies either inhibit the binding of HVEM to BTLA and gD without promoting its binding to LIGHT, or they do not specifically target cancer treatments effectively.

Innovation Solution

Development of an anti-HVEM monoclonal antibody that binds to human HVEM with high affinity, inhibiting the binding to BTLA and gD while promoting the binding to LIGHT, along with a method for producing and administering this antibody for cancer treatment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an anti-HVEM antibody is designed to inhibit the binding of HVEM to BTLA and gD, then the antibody shows promise for treating hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases, but it fails to promote the binding of HVEM to LIGHT, limiting its effectiveness for solid tumor treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness for hematologic malignanciesVSAvoideffectiveness for solid tumors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The antibody is designed to exhibit different functional effects at different binding interfaces: it inhibits HVEM-BTLA binding while simultaneously promoting HVEM-LIGHT binding. This local differentiation of binding effects allows the single antibody to address multiple disease types with different pathogenic mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The anti-HVEM antibody achieves multi-functionality by simultaneously performing two opposing actions: blocking inhibitory HVEM-BTLA interactions and enhancing stimulatory HVEM-LIGHT interactions. This dual functionality enables the antibody to treat both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If existing anti-HVEM antibodies block all binding interactions of HVEM including LIGHT, then they show broad inhibition activity, but they cannot selectively promote anti-tumor immune responses through HVEM-LIGHT signaling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebroad inhibition activityVSAvoidselectivity of binding promotion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The antibody exhibits selective functional outcomes for different HVEM ligands: it blocks BTLA and gD binding while promoting LIGHT binding. This local quality differentiation at molecular interfaces enables selective enhancement of desired anti-tumor signaling pathways without interfering with other immune regulation mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The antibody acts as an intermediary that modulates different HVEM-ligand interactions in opposite directions. By serving as a selective mediator, it enhances beneficial HVEM-LIGHT signaling while blocking harmful HVEM-BTLA interactions, achieving precise control over immune response regulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240034800A1Anti-HVEM antibody, and composition and method associated with same
Publication Date: 2024.02.01 MEDY TOX INC
  • US20240034800A1 patent drawing
  • US20240034800A1 patent drawing
  • US20240034800A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are an anti-HVEM monoclonal antibody that binds to human HVEM with high affinity, and inhibits the binding of HVEM to BTLA but promotes the binding of HVEM to LIGHT, and thus can be used alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents to treat solid tumor or hematologic malignancy, and a composition and a method which are related to the antibody.