Aircraft Anti-icing System Sensor Fault Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft anti-icing systems for engine fan nacelle inlets lack robustness in controlling bleed air flow and detecting temperature sensor faults, leading to inefficient ice removal and potential damage from excessive hot air.

Innovation Solution

An anti-icing system with multiple temperature sensors and valves controlled by a sophisticated controller that regulates fluid flow and pressure, includes a duct temperature sensor to detect burst conditions and alternate valve positions to ensure efficient ice removal and prevent damage, utilizing stepper servo valves and a FADEC controller for robust operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple temperature sensors are used to detect temperature at different locations, then measurement precision and fault detection capability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature detection accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The temperature monitoring function is segmented into multiple sensors positioned at different locations (inlet temperature sensors within the D-duct and duct temperature sensor outside the D-duct). This segmentation enables both precise temperature measurement and fault detection by comparing readings from different positions, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If sophisticated control with multiple valves is used to regulate fluid flow and pressure, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidvalve control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow control function is segmented into multiple valves positioned at different locations in the duct. This segmentation provides redundancy and improved reliability, as the system can tolerate valve failures while maintaining anti-icing functionality. The segmented control architecture resolves the contradiction between reliability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller dynamically changes flow and pressure parameters by adjusting valve positions based on temperature sensor readings. This parameter adjustment capability enables reliable ice prevention while managing system complexity through adaptive control rather than fixed complex mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If precise flow and pressure control is implemented, then productivity in ice removal is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice removal efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller uses feedback from temperature sensors to automatically adjust valve positions and regulate fluid flow and pressure. This closed-loop feedback control improves ice removal productivity by maintaining optimal conditions dynamically, while avoiding the need for overly complex manual control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If temperature sensors are monitored for fault conditions, then reliability is improved, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidtemperature reading accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple temperature sensors are segmented across different locations, allowing the system to detect faults by comparing relative temperature differences between positions. This segmented approach improves reliability through fault detection without requiring each individual sensor to achieve extremely high measurement precision, as the comparative analysis provides robust fault identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents ice accretion on aircraft structures by precisely controlling fluid flow and pressure, detects and responds to temperature sensor faults, and alternates valve use to distribute wear evenly, enhancing system reliability and reducing the risk of damage from excessive hot air.

Implementation Method 1

multiple temperature sensors, disposed at the aircraft structure, with each temperature sensor configured to detect a temperature associated with an aircraft structure location

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature detection:

Implementation Method 2

The flow of hot fluid from the compressor section is regulating using a valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow regulation:

Implementation Method 3

bleed air from the compressor section is provided to an aircraft structure susceptible to ice accretion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Data Source

PatentEP3034813B1Aircraft Anti-icing system
Publication Date: 2024.10.02 RTX CORP
  • EP3034813B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3034813B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

An anti-icing system (60) for an aircraft structure includes a cavity that has an exterior surface subject to ice accretion and a bleed source (62) that is configured to provide a fluid to the cavity via a duct (68). The system (60) includes multiple temperature sensors (82, 84, 86), disposed at the aircraft structure, with each temperature sensor (82, 84, 86) configured to detect a temperature associated with an aircraft structure location. A controller (88) is in communication with the temperature sensors (82, 84, 86). The controller (88) is programmed to compare outputs of the temperature sensors (82, 84, 86) and to determine a temperature sensor fault condition (104).