Anti-PD-1 Therapy Selection Using Inflammatory Gene Signatures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cancer immunotherapy approaches, such as those using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, have variable effectiveness due to individual patient characteristics, necessitating targeted strategies to identify suitable candidates for treatment.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the identification of patients with high inflammatory signature scores and tumor mutation burden (TMB) status of at least 10 mutations per megabase, using an inflammatory gene panel comprising CD274 (PD-L1), CD8A, and STAT1, to determine suitability for anti-PD-1 antibody treatment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If anti-PD-1 antibody treatment is administered to all cancer patients, then treatment accessibility is improved, but treatment effectiveness decreases due to variable patient response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidpatient suitability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by identifying specific patient subgroups with distinct molecular characteristics (high inflammatory signature score and high TMB) who are most likely to respond to anti-PD-1 therapy. This allows the treatment to be optimized for specific local patient populations rather than applied uniformly to all cancer patients, thereby improving overall treatment effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by establishing specific threshold values for inflammatory signature score and tumor mutation burden that define the optimal patient population for treatment. By changing the selection criteria based on these measurable parameters, the treatment can be directed at patients with the highest probability of response, improving effectiveness while managing adaptability constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If patient identification criteria are made more specific, then treatment precision is improved, but diagnostic complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient selection precisionVSAvoiddiagnostic assay complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the patient selection process into two independent, measurable components: inflammatory signature score (based on gene expression) and tumor mutation burden (based on genomic sequencing). This segmentation allows each parameter to be assessed separately using established methods, achieving precise patient selection without requiring a single complex diagnostic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses intermediary markers (inflammatory signature score and TMB) as mediators between the complex biological reality of tumor immunology and the practical needs of patient selection. These intermediaries provide quantifiable, measurable criteria that bridge the gap between basic science and clinical application, enabling precise patient identification through relatively straightforward diagnostic assays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20220195046A1Methods of treating tumor
Publication Date: 2022.06.23 BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO
  • US20220195046A1 patent drawing
  • US20220195046A1 patent drawing
  • US20220195046A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure provides a method for treating a subject afflicted with a tumor comprising administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of an anti-PD-1 antibody or antigen-binding portion thereof or an anti-PD-L1 antibody or anti-gen-binding portion thereof, wherein the subject is identified as having a high inflammatory gene signature score and a tumor that has a high tumor mutation burden (TMB) status. In some embodiments, the high inflammatory gene signature score is determined by measuring the expression of a panel of inflammatory genes in a tumor sample obtained from the subject, wherein the inflammatory gene panel comprises CD274 (PD-L1), CD8A, LAG3, and STAT1.