Anti-reflow Cover for Computer Module Airflow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing cooling systems in computing devices face airflow inefficiencies when modular component housings are pulled out from the chassis, leading to reduced cooling efficiency for internal components.

Innovation Solution

A modular component housing design with a rear cover that can rotate between open and closed positions, blocking airflow when pulled out to maintain efficient cooling when inserted, utilizing a spring arm mechanism for automatic positioning based on the housing's insertion state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the modular component housing is pulled out from the chassis, then accessibility for service is improved, but airflow to internal components is blocked causing cooling efficiency to deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility for serviceVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The cover is designed to dynamically change its state between open and closed positions based on whether the housing is inserted or pulled out. When the housing is pulled out, the cover automatically closes to block airflow; when inserted, it opens to allow airflow. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the cover's airflow-blocking property conditional rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring arm mechanism provides automatic feedback-based control. The position of the housing (inserted or pulled out) serves as input feedback that triggers the cover to transition to the appropriate state. The spring arm detects the housing position and automatically actuates the cover accordingly, ensuring cooling efficiency is maintained without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Temperature

If the rear cover is kept closed to block airflow, then cooling efficiency is improved, but accessibility when housing is pulled out is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidaccessibility when pulled out
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cover transitions from a static closed state to a dynamic state that opens automatically when the housing is pulled out. This dynamic behavior allows the cover to provide cooling when needed (when housing is inserted) while not obstructing service access when the housing is removed, thus resolving the contradiction between cooling efficiency and accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring arm mechanism is pre-configured to automatically open the cover before service access is needed. As the housing is pulled out, the spring arm提前 (in advance) actuates the cover to the open position, ensuring that the path for removing or servicing components is clear before the service action is completed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If a fixed closed cover is used, then airflow bypass is prevented, but the system cannot adapt to different operational states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow controlVSAvoidadaptability to operational states
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The cover system transitions from a fixed closed state to a dynamic system that adapts its airflow-blocking property based on operational state. The spring arm mechanism enables the cover to automatically switch between open and closed states, providing reliable airflow control when the housing is inserted while adapting to the pulled-out state for service, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses self-service through the spring arm mechanism that automatically detects the housing position and actuates the cover without external control. The mechanism serves itself by using the mechanical energy from housing insertion/removal to control the cover state, ensuring both reliable airflow management and adaptability to different operational states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design ensures continuous airflow to internal components during normal operation and prevents airflow bypass when the modular housing is pulled out for service, maintaining optimal thermal management and component operation.

Implementation Method 1

The cover may be rotated by a spring arm mechanism that rotates the cover between the open and closed positions based on whether the housing is inserted or pulled out.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring mechanism: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS11369036B2Anti-reflow cover for a computer system component module
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 QUANTA COMPUTER INC
  • US11369036B2 patent drawing
  • US11369036B2 patent drawing
  • US11369036B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A component housing insertable in a chassis for a computing device blocking air flow when in a pulled out position is disclosed. The component housing has a front end and an opposite rear end. A pair of side walls are provided between the front end and the rear end. The side walls are slidably connected to the chassis to allow the component housing to be moved between an inserted position and the pulled-out position. A cover on the rear end has an open position allowing air flow through the rear end when the component housing is in the inserted position. The cover has a closed position blocking air flow through the aperture when the component housing is in the pulled out position.