Anti-Siphon Obstruction Structure for Fuel Tank Backflow Relief

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anti-siphon devices for fluid tanks, such as vehicle fuel tanks, often experience backflow and pressure buildup during fuel dispensation due to the obstruction design, which can impede fluid flow and lead to splashback or incomplete filling.

Innovation Solution

The anti-siphon device incorporates a chamber within the obstruction with an inlet aperture and multiple outlet apertures, creating a second flow passageway that allows fluid to flow from the inlet aperture to the outlet aperture, reducing pressure buildup and enhancing fluid flow by directing it perpendicular to the main flow passageway, thereby minimizing backflow and turbulence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a conventional obstruction design is used in anti-siphon devices, then the device structure is simple, but backflow and pressure buildup occur during fuel dispensation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstruction structureVSAvoidfluid flow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The obstruction is segmented into multiple functional zones: a conical portion for initial flow guidance, a cylindrical portion with circumferential outlets for pressure relief, and a flared outlet portion for flow expansion. This segmentation allows each zone to address specific flow control requirements, preventing backflow while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cylindrical portion with circumferential outlets acts as an intermediary element between the conical inlet and flared outlet. It mediates the fluid flow by providing multiple discharge paths that equalize pressure distribution, preventing the pressure buildup that would otherwise cause backflow in simpler obstruction designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the obstruction creates a direct flow path, then fluid flow rate is high, but pressure buildup causes backflow and turbulence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel filling speedVSAvoidbackflow and turbulence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different portions of the obstruction have different geometric properties optimized for their local function: the conical portion narrows to guide flow, the cylindrical portion provides uniform pressure distribution through circumferential outlets, and the flared outlet expands to reduce turbulence. This local optimization allows high flow rates without backflow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The circumferential outlets in the cylindrical portion add a radial dimension to the flow path, distributing fluid discharge around the circumference rather than in a single direction. This dimensional change prevents pressure concentration and reduces backflow while maintaining overall productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If the obstruction has a large diameter to block siphon tubes, then anti-siphon effectiveness is improved, but pressure point formation increases backflow risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-siphon effectivenessVSAvoidpressure point and backflow
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The conical portion of the obstruction uses a curved, tapered geometry rather than a sharp edge or flat surface. This curvature gradually guides the fluid around the obstruction, preventing the formation of concentrated pressure points that would occur with abrupt geometric changes, thereby reducing backflow while maintaining anti-siphon effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces the risk and magnitude of backflow during fuel dispensation, ensuring smoother and faster filling of the tank by maintaining fluid flow rates and preventing the fuel dispensing nozzle from cutting off the supply.

Implementation Method 1

the inlet aperture, chamber, and outlet aperture defining a second flow passageway between the inlet aperture and the outlet aperture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Data Source

PatentUS11938808B2Obstruction design
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 TISS LTD
  • US11938808B2 patent drawing
  • US11938808B2 patent drawing
  • US11938808B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided an anti-siphon device for securing in a fluid tank inlet. The anti-siphon device comprises a housing, an inlet to the housing adapted to receive a fluid dispensing nozzle, the inlet at a proximal end of the hosing, and an outlet at a distal end of the housing. The anti-siphon device further comprises an obstruction disposed within the housing, where an outer surface of the obstruction and an inner wall of the housing define a first flow passageway. The obstruction comprises, a chamber disposed within the obstruction and configured to receive fluid, an inlet aperture in a first portion of the obstruction, and an outlet aperture in a second portion of the obstruction, where the inlet aperture, chamber, and outlet aperture define a second flow passageway, the second flow passageway being configured such that, in use, fluid can flow from the inlet aperture to the outlet aperture via the second flow passageway, whilst flows from the inlet to the outlet via the first flow passageway.