Anti-twist safeguard using plastic anti-friction lining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anti-twist safeguards for linear motion devices are complex to produce and suffer from high wear, particularly due to the production complexity of splines and the need for rolling contact bearings.

Innovation Solution

An anti-twist safeguard using a separate elongate anti-friction lining with a constant rectangular cross-sectional shape, made from low-cost, high-strength plastic like PTFE, is arranged transversely to the longitudinal axis, providing a large sliding surface with minimal material usage and low wear, and can be easily produced and installed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If splines are used for anti-twist safeguard, then torque support and engagement surface are improved, but production complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque supportVSAvoidproduction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex metal splines with simple plastic anti-friction linings that are easier and cheaper to manufacture. The plastic linings achieve sufficient torque support through friction rather than mechanical interlocking, accepting that they may wear over time but gaining significant manufacturing simplicity and cost reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical spline interlocking system with a friction-based plastic lining system. Instead of relying on precise mechanical engagement of splines, the solution uses friction between the plastic lining and the extension arm to provide anti-twist protection, dramatically simplifying production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If rolling contact bearings are used to minimize wear, then wear is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidcomplexity of anti-twist safeguard
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent accepts that simple plastic linings will wear over time but replaces complex rolling contact bearings with these inexpensive, easily replaceable plastic components. The linings provide sufficient wear resistance for the application while being much simpler in construction and far easier to replace when worn.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameter from metal to plastic, fundamentally altering the wear characteristics. The plastic material provides self-lubricating properties and sufficient wear resistance without requiring the complex rolling contact bearing mechanism, achieving wear reduction through material selection rather than mechanical design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If anti-friction lining with large contact area is used, then wear is reduced, but material consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear resistanceVSAvoidmaterial consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the anti-friction lining only where necessary - on the specific contact surfaces that require wear resistance. The lining is positioned locally at the interface between the extension arm and housing, providing wear protection exactly where friction occurs rather than covering entire components, thus minimizing material consumption while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces production complexity and wear, allowing for efficient torque support while maintaining structural stiffness and ease of assembly, with the ability to be used in various device sizes and configurations.

Implementation Method 1

an anti-friction lining, which is formed with a constant cross-sectional shape... having particularly favorable anti-friction properties

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

The elongate shape of the anti-friction lining leads to a large area of contact between the extension arm and the anti-friction lining, ensuring that the wear which occurs there is low

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Data Source

PatentUS9151372B2Linear motion device having an anti-twist safeguard, comprising an elongate anti-friction lining
Publication Date: 2015.10.06 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US9151372B2 patent drawing
  • US9151372B2 patent drawing
  • US9151372B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A linear motion device includes a housing, an extension arm, and an anti-twist safeguard. The extension arm projects from the housing and includes a securing section. The anti-twist safeguard includes at least one separate elongate anti-friction lining, which is formed with a constant cross-sectional shape. The anti-friction lining is arranged substantially without play between the housing and the securing section of the extension arm and extends transversely to a longitudinal axis. The extension arm is supported on the housing in such a way that it can move along the longitudinal axis. In the securing section, the extension arm extends parallel to the longitudinal axis with a constant external cross-sectional shape deviating from a circular shape. The anti-twist safeguard engages positively in said external cross-sectional shape, thus securing the extension arm with respect to the housing against twisting relative to the longitudinal axis.