Antibody Epitope Profiling for SARS-CoV-2 Severity Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is an ongoing need for improved compositions and methods to address differences in immune responses to coronavirus infections, particularly in understanding how preexisting humoral memory responses against seasonal human coronaviruses contribute to the severity and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Innovation Solution

The disclosure provides characterization of anti-spike IgG levels in non-hospitalized convalescent individuals and ICU-hospitalized patients, demonstrating correlations with disease severity, FcγR activation, and cross-reactivity against betacoronaviruses, and proposes using epitope targeting ratios to predict severity and vaccine efficacy, tailoring treatments based on antibody profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If preexisting humoral memory responses against seasonal coronaviruses are present, then cross-reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein increases, but disease severity may be exacerbated through ADE mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-reactivity of immune responseVSAvoiddisease severity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by measuring and comparing antibody titers against different epitopic regions (S1 vs S2, RBD vs non-RBD) to determine the quality of the immune response. By quantifying the ratio of neutralizing to non-neutralizing antibodies, the method transforms a harmful cross-reactive response into a measurable parameter that guides clinical intervention decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the measured antibody profile to inform subsequent clinical decisions. The assay results provide feedback about the patient's immune response quality, which then guides whether to administer vaccination, monoclonal antibodies, or other interventions, creating a closed-loop system that adjusts treatment based on immune status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If high levels of anti-spike IgG are produced, then neutralization capacity may increase, but FcγR activation and proinflammatory mediator production increase disease severity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneutralization capacityVSAvoidproinflammatory mediator production
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the antibody response into distinct functional components by measuring antibodies against specific epitopic regions separately. By dividing the total anti-spike IgG into neutralizing (RBD-directed) and non-neutralizing (S2-directed) components, the method can identify and address the harmful segment without suppressing the beneficial neutralizing response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by evaluating the functional quality of antibodies at specific epitopic locations rather than treating all anti-spike antibodies uniformly. The method identifies that antibodies against certain regions (S2, non-RBD) have harmful local effects through FcγR activation, while antibodies against other regions (RBD) have protective local effects through neutralization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If conventional antibody assays measure total anti-spike IgG, then overall immune response is quantified, but differential effects of antibodies against different epitopic regions are masked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal anti-spike IgGVSAvoidepitope-specific antibody profile
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the measurement process into multiple specific assays targeting different epitopic regions. Instead of a single total IgG measurement, the method divides the assessment into separate measurements for S1-directed, S2-directed, RBD-directed, and non-RBD-directed antibodies, preserving the differential information that would otherwise be lost in aggregation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds another dimension to the measurement by introducing epitope-specificity as a new measurement axis. Rather than measuring only the quantity of total anti-spike IgG, the method adds the dimension of target specificity, creating a multi-dimensional profile that captures both quantity and quality of the immune response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20240385189A1Compositions and methods for determining humoral immune responses against seasonal coronaviruses and predicting efficiency of SARS-cov-2 spike targeting, covid-19 disease severity, and providing interventions
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 JACOBS TECHNION CORNELL INST
  • US20240385189A1 patent drawing
  • US20240385189A1 patent drawing
  • US20240385189A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are compositions and methods for use in determining antibody profiles from individuals who have been infected, vaccinated, or both infected and vaccinated with a one or more types of coronavirus. The compositions and methods can be used for predicting severity of outcomes, or for developing and implementing medical interventions.