Human Antibody Framework Selection via Germline Database

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for humanizing non-human monoclonal antibodies, such as CDR grafting, rely on mathematical best-fit strategies that may not account for biological significance and interchain interactions, and often use mature antibody genes with somatic mutations, leading to potential immunogenicity and incomplete V-J combinations, which complicates the selection of optimal human frameworks for antibody adaptation.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the creation of a virtual human framework database using germline V and J genes to select human antibody frameworks based on similarity and compatibility, constructing a library of peptide sequences for framework regions, and selecting representative frameworks to generate human-adapted antibodies that preserve antigen-binding activity without requiring detailed antibody-antigen complex structure information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If mathematical best-fit strategies are used to select human antibody frameworks, then the selection process is simplified and can be performed without detailed structural information, but the biological significance and interchain interactions are not accounted for, leading to suboptimal antibody adaptation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframework selection processVSAvoidantibody adaptation outcome
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the framework selection process into multiple evaluation dimensions: individual framework similarity scoring, interchain compatibility assessment, and combined pairing evaluation. This segmentation allows the method to simultaneously consider both ease of selection through systematic scoring and reliability through comprehensive biological factor assessment, resolving the contradiction between simplified process and accurate outcome.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If mature antibody genes with somatic mutations are used as frameworks, then the frameworks may show higher sequence similarity to donor antibodies, but they introduce immunogenicity concerns and may contain incomplete V-J combinations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesequence similarityVSAvoidimmunogenicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the selection parameter from prioritizing maximum sequence similarity to optimizing a balanced score that considers similarity alongside immunogenicity risk and V-J combination completeness. This parameter change allows the method to select frameworks that achieve sufficient similarity for CDR grafting while avoiding the harmful effects of somatic mutations and incomplete combinations, thus resolving the contradiction between precision and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If separate best-fit heavy and light chain acceptors are selected independently, then each chain can be optimized individually, but the paired chains may not fit together optimally to conserve binding activity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual chain optimizationVSAvoidinterchain compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the individual chain selection processes by introducing an interchain compatibility evaluation step that assesses how well selected heavy and light chain frameworks work together. This combination of individual optimization with joint evaluation ensures both manufacturing precision in chain selection and reliability in their functional interaction, resolving the contradiction between individual and paired optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If comprehensive evaluation of all framework regions and interchain interactions is performed, then the most optimal human-adapted antibodies can be selected, but the complexity of the selection process increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimal antibody selectionVSAvoidselection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual evaluation mechanisms with a computational scoring system that automatically assesses framework similarity, interchain compatibility, and overall adaptation quality. This substitution maintains high reliability in selection by systematically evaluating all relevant factors while reducing process complexity through algorithmic automation, resolving the contradiction between comprehensive evaluation and manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2094728B1Methods for use in human-adapting monoclonal antibodies
Publication Date: 2013.04.10 JANSSEN BIOTECH INC
  • EP2094728B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2094728B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2094728B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods useful for human adapting non-human monoclonal antibodies are disclosed. The methods select candidate human antibody framework sequences from a human germline framework database.