Antibody Lineage Analysis for Efficient Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for identifying and isolating lineage-related antibodies from an immunized animal's repertoire are inefficient and complex, often requiring individual screening of millions of antibodies and introducing biases in PCR-based methods that limit sequence diversity.

Innovation Solution

A computational method involving obtaining nucleotide sequences of heavy and light chain-encoding nucleic acids from a first antibody, screening the antibody repertoire to identify lineage-related sequences, and expressing these sequences in a host cell to produce antibodies that bind to the same antigen.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If individual screening of millions of antibodies is performed, then antibodies with desirable properties can be identified, but the process becomes inefficient and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantibody identification accuracyVSAvoidscreening efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the antibody repertoire into lineage groups based on sequence similarity (e.g., sharing common CDR3 regions). Instead of screening all antibodies individually, the method identifies representative antibodies from each lineage group, reducing the screening pool from millions to a manageable number while maintaining identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary computational analysis to identify lineage-related antibodies and select representative candidates before bioassay screening. This preliminary sorting based on sequence homology prepares the antibody pool in advance, allowing efficient subsequent testing of only the most promising candidates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Quantity of substance

If PCR-based methods are used to amplify antibody sequences, then sequence diversity can be obtained, but biases are introduced that limit the diversity of sequences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesequence diversityVSAvoidsequence representation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses computational copying of sequence information from high-throughput sequencing data to identify lineage-related antibodies, rather than relying on PCR amplification. This in silico approach replicates sequence diversity without introducing PCR biases, maintaining accurate representation of the original antibody repertoire.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of antibodies are sampled from the repertoire, then antibodies with similar or improved properties can be identified, but the complexity of the identification process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantibody property variationVSAvoididentification process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual screening and sorting processes with computational algorithms that automatically analyze sequence data, identify lineage relationships, and select representative antibodies. This substitution of computational mechanics for manual procedures reduces process complexity while handling large numbers of antibody sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11661598B2Antibody identification by lineage analysis
Publication Date: 2023.05.30 EPITOMICS INC
  • US11661598B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of screening is provided. In certain embodiments, the method involves a) obtaining the nucleotide sequences of: i. a heavy chain-encoding nucleic acid that encodes the variable domain of a heavy chain of a first antibody of an animal; and ii. a light chain-encoding nucleic acid that encodes the variable domain of a light chain of the first antibody; b) obtaining nucleotide sequences of cDNAs encoding at least a portion of the antibody repertoire of the animal; c) computationally screening the sequences obtained in b) to identify heavy and light chain sequences that are related by lineage to the heavy and light chain sequences of a); and d) testing at least one pair of the heavy and light chain sequences identified in c) to identify a second antibody that binds to the same antigen as the first antibody.