Antibody Purification via pH Adjustment for HCP Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for reducing host cell proteins (HCPs) in therapeutic or diagnostic protein preparations are inefficient, leading to incomplete removal, aggregation, immunogenicity concerns, and increased manufacturing costs, with limitations in applicability to specific molecules and formats.

Innovation Solution

A method involving affinity chromatography with a buffer combination of weak and strong acids, followed by pH adjustment and depth filtration, effectively reduces HCPs to very low levels (<1 ppm) without affecting protein stability or yield, and is applicable to a broad range of molecules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional purification methods are used to remove HCPs, then HCP removal is achieved, but additional purification steps are required resulting in reduced yield and increased manufacturing costs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHCP removal efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing yield and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention combines HCP removal and virus inactivation into a single integrated step by adjusting the pH of the eluate to below pH 4.0 after affinity chromatography. This dual-function approach eliminates the need for separate purification steps, thereby maintaining manufacturing yield while reducing costs and achieving effective HCP removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention utilizes pH adjustment as a critical parameter change to achieve both HCP removal and virus inactivation. By lowering the pH to below 4.0, the method creates conditions that simultaneously denature HCPs and inactivate viruses, while the antibody remains stable due to its specific pH resilience characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If additional purification steps are added to reduce HCPs, then HCP content is reduced, but product aggregation and immunogenicity risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHCP content reductionVSAvoidaggregation and immunogenicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By precisely controlling the pH parameter to remain below pH 4.0 during the integrated purification step, the method achieves effective HCP removal and virus inactivation while preventing antibody aggregation. The low pH conditions selectively affect HCPs and viruses while the antibody's stable structure at this pH protects it from aggregation and maintains its therapeutic properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If current HCP removal processes are applied, then some HCPs are removed, but incomplete removal and inconsistency lead to aggregation and immunogenicity concerns

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHCP removal completenessVSAvoidprocess consistency and product stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention establishes a defined pH range (below pH 4.0) that ensures complete and consistent HCP removal across different batches. This parameter control creates reproducible conditions where HCPs are reliably denatured and removed, eliminating the inconsistency and aggregation problems associated with conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The method converts the typically harmful low pH condition into a beneficial tool for complete HCP removal. By intentionally maintaining pH below 4.0, the process exploits the differential pH stability between HCPs (which denature) and the antibody (which remains stable), achieving complete HCP elimination without compromising product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Manufacturing precision

If increased volumes and additional purification steps are used, then HCPs are removed, but manufacturing costs increase and yield is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHCP removal effectivenessVSAvoidproduct yield and manufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges HCP removal and virus inactivation into one integrated pH adjustment step performed immediately after affinity chromatography. This consolidation eliminates multiple separate purification steps, prevents product loss through repeated handling and concentration steps, and reduces manufacturing costs while achieving complete HCP removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The method maintains continuous processing by performing pH adjustment and HCP removal in a seamless sequence without interrupting the flow of the antibody preparation. This continuous action prevents product loss that occurs during batch processing and multiple purification steps, thereby maintaining high yield while achieving effective HCP removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method significantly reduces HCPs to extremely low levels, minimizing aggregation and immunogenicity risks while maintaining product stability and yield, and reducing manufacturing costs by eliminating the need for additional purification steps.

Implementation Method 1

subjecting the protein preparation recombinantly produced in a host cell to an affinity chromatography column

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAffinity chromatography: Chromatography

Implementation Method 2

eluting the anti-N3pGlu Aβ antibody from the chromatography column with a buffer comprising a combination of a weak acid and a strong acid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcid elution:

Implementation Method 3

adjusting the pH of the eluate comprising the anti-N3pGlu Aβ antibody to below about pH 4.0

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectpH-induced denaturation:

Implementation Method 4

wherein viral inactivation is achieved

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViral inactivation:

Implementation Method 5

subjecting the eluate comprising the anti-N3pGlu Aβ antibody to a depth filter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDepth filtration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS20230406914A1Methods for reducing host cell protein content in antibody purification processes and antibody compositions having reduced host cell protein content
Publication Date: 2023.12.21 ELI LILLY & CO

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to methods for reducing host cell protein content in antibody preparation recombinantly produced in a host cell in the manufacturing process of antibodies intended for administration to a patient. The disclosed methods may be performed in order to prepare therapeutic antibody preparations having reduced host cell protein.