Aircraft Pressure Bulkhead Using Anticlastic Composite Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing construction methods for pressure bulkheads in aircraft, particularly with the introduction of carbon fiber composite materials, face challenges in producing lightweight, cost-effective structures that can absorb pressure differences without compromising stability, as traditional metal construction methods are costly and inefficient for large components with complex geometries.

Innovation Solution

The use of anticlastic surfaces with double-curvature, which absorb compressive and tensile stresses, eliminating the need for reinforcement profiles and allowing for cost-effective production using fiber composite methods such as prepreg and resin infusion, enabling the creation of lightweight, stable pressure bulkheads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional metal construction methods are used for pressure bulkheads, then structural strength and stability are ensured, but production costs increase and weight efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials (carbon fiber reinforced plastics, glass fiber reinforced plastics, or aramid fiber reinforced plastics) to construct the pressure bulkhead, replacing traditional metal materials. This resolves the contradiction by providing both the required structural strength and reduced production costs, as composites can be molded into complex geometries without expensive machining and joining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a double-curved (anticlastic) surface geometry for the pressure bulkhead instead of flat or single-curved surfaces. This curvature design inherently provides structural strength to resist pressure differences while enabling cost-effective production through composite molding, eliminating the need for additional reinforcement profiles required in traditional metal construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Stability of the object's composition

If reinforcement profiles are added to metal bulkheads to ensure stability under pressure, then structural stability improves, but device complexity and production cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The double-curved surface geometry inherently provides the necessary structural stability to resist compressive and tensile stresses from pressure differences. This eliminates the need for additional reinforcement profiles, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

Composite materials can be molded into complex double-curved geometries with optimized fiber orientations that provide inherent structural stability without requiring separate reinforcement elements. This integrates the reinforcement function into the bulkhead structure itself, reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If flat or single-curved bulkhead surfaces are used, then manufacturing is simpler, but weight efficiency and structural performance under pressure deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidbulkhead weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The double-curved surface geometry optimally distributes compressive and tensile stresses under pressure loads, enabling the use of thinner, lighter structures compared to flat or single-curved designs. This resolves the contradiction by achieving weight efficiency through geometric optimization while maintaining manufacturability via composite molding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a cost-effective and weight-efficient pressure bulkhead that can withstand significant pressure differences without instability, replacing traditional flat or single-curved bulkheads and optimizing weight distribution while reducing production costs.

Implementation Method 1

Through the use of the double-curved surfaces curved in opposite directions, reinforcement profiles can be dispensed with in the case of pressure bulkheads of this type. The compressive loads occurring for the bulkhead are removed through tensile stresses and compressive stresses in the surface.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStress distribution through curvature:

Data Source

PatentUS8302910B2Pressure bulkhead for an aircraft
Publication Date: 2012.11.06 AIRBUS DEFENCE & SPACE GMBH
  • US8302910B2 patent drawing
  • US8302910B2 patent drawing
  • US8302910B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pressure bulkhead for an aircraft, a method of manufacturing an aircraft, and an aircraft. The bulkhead includes at least one anticlastic shaped surface element. The instant abstract is neither intended to define the invention disclosed in this specification nor intended to limit the scope of the invention in any way.