Antifraud Scoring System Using Multi-Source Location Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Legacy banking and payments processing firms face challenges in fraud detection and user onboarding due to reliance on manual processes, vulnerability to fraudulent account creation with fake information, and difficulties in verifying user location accurately.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize internet-enabled wireless mobile devices and a payments server to extract and analyze user and device data, including location information, to enhance fraud detection and user verification, while continuously monitoring for risk factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual review process is used for KYC/KYB verification, then fraud detection reliability is improved, but user onboarding speed and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection reliabilityVSAvoiduser onboarding speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is segmented into multiple independent checks: device fingerprinting, location verification through multiple sources (GPS, cell tower, IP), document authentication, and behavioral analysis. Each segment operates independently to contribute to the overall fraud risk score, enabling automated decision-making without manual review while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary antifraud scoring system that acts as a mediator between user submission and final approval. This intermediary automatically evaluates multiple data sources (device metadata, location information, document verification results) and produces a risk score, eliminating the need for manual review while preserving detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If traditional location verification methods (IP address) are used, then system complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of user location deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoiduser location accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple location verification methods (GPS coordinates, cell tower triangulation, IP address geolocation) into a unified location assessment. By combining these independent sources, the system achieves high measurement precision without significantly increasing complexity, as each method complements the others to provide redundant verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The location verification system is designed to universally accept multiple data sources (GPS, cell tower, IP) that can function independently or in combination. This multi-functional approach allows the system to adapt to different scenarios and maintain precision without requiring complex specialized mechanisms for each location source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If GPS location access is forced for all users, then location verification reliability is improved, but ease of operation and user experience deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation verification reliabilityVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts location verification requirements based on risk assessment. Instead of forcing GPS access on all users, the system selectively requests location data only when other verification methods indicate potential fraud risk, making the process adaptive and user-friendly while maintaining reliability for high-risk cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different location verification methods are applied locally based on specific risk indicators. For example, GPS is requested only when behavioral patterns or device metadata raise concerns, while low-risk users undergo simpler verification. This localized application of verification strictness maintains reliability where needed while preserving ease of operation for legitimate users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If multiple data sources are collected and analyzed, then fraud detection precision is improved, but device complexity and processing requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary collection and basic analysis of device metadata, location information, and document data during the onboarding process itself. By preparing and pre-processing this data before the actual fraud assessment, the system reduces the complexity of real-time analysis and enables faster, more precise fraud detection without overwhelming processing requirements during critical decision moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250148467A1System and method for an antifraud scoring system
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 REWIRE HLDG LTD
  • US20250148467A1 patent drawing
  • US20250148467A1 patent drawing
  • US20250148467A1 patent drawing

AI summary

There is disclosed an antifraud system including a plurality of internet enabled wireless mobile devices and at least one payments server device, each respective internet enabled wireless mobile device including at least one respective transceiver being a respective cellular phone network transceiver, a respective non-transitory storage medium, and a respective computer program product embodied on the respective non-transitory storage medium, the respective computer program product executable on the respective internet enabled wireless mobile device to communicate with the payments server device and the payments server device including at least one internet enabled interface, a server non-transitory storage medium, and a server computer program product embodied on the server non-transitory storage medium, the server computer program product executable on the payments server device to communicate with the internet enabled wireless mobile devices. Related computer-implemented methods and computer program products are disclosed.