Anti-fuse Structure With Laser-Etched Defect-Responsive Openings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for integrating anti-fuse structures into semiconductor circuits face challenges in efficiently creating conductive paths and repairing defects, as they often require standardized and uniform anti-fuse openings, limiting flexibility and efficiency in addressing circuit defects.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an insulating layer with embedded conductors, where laser etching and lithographic processes are used to form anti-fuse openings, followed by the formation of an under bump metallurgy layer to electrically connect exposed conductors, allowing for customizable and flexible programming of anti-fuse structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If standardized anti-fuse openings are used for all chips, then mass production efficiency is improved, but flexibility in addressing specific circuit defects is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass production efficiencyVSAvoidflexibility in addressing circuit defects
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic anti-fuse opening formation process where the decision to form an opening at a specific location is made based on detected circuit defects. The system transitions from a static, pre-determined opening pattern to a dynamic, defect-responsive pattern, allowing openings to be created only where needed while maintaining mass production efficiency through automated defect detection and selective opening formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If anti-fuse openings are formed for all possible defect locations, then adaptability to any defect is improved, but energy consumption and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to defect locationsVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by forming anti-fuse openings only at specific locations where defects are detected, rather than creating openings across the entire chip. This localized approach ensures that energy and manufacturing resources are concentrated only where needed, reducing overall energy consumption and manufacturing complexity while maintaining the ability to address any detected defect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by creating anti-fuse openings only for the specific defect locations that require repair, rather than forming openings for all possible defect locations. This selective approach avoids excessive manufacturing actions and energy consumption while still providing adequate adaptability to address the actual defects present in each chip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If laser etching is used to create anti-fuse openings, then precision in opening formation is improved, but manufacturing complexity and equipment requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveopening formation precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the defect detection process with the anti-fuse opening formation process, integrating these two functions into a coordinated manufacturing workflow. By combining automated optical inspection or electrical testing with subsequent laser processing, the system achieves precise opening formation at defect locations without requiring separate, complex manufacturing stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the creation of anti-fuse structures that can be programmed at different positions on each chip based on specific defects, reducing unnecessary openings and energy consumption, while allowing for mass production with standardized codes.

Implementation Method 1

the insulating layer is etched by a laser to form an anti-fuse opening in the insulating layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS8884398B2Anti-fuse structure and programming method thereof
Publication Date: 2014.11.11 UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORP
  • US8884398B2 patent drawing
  • US8884398B2 patent drawing
  • US8884398B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of programming an anti-fuse includes steps as follows. First, an insulating layer is provided. An anti-fuse region is defined on the insulating layer. An anti-fuse is embedded within the anti-fuse region of the insulating layer. The anti-fuse includes at least a first conductor and a second conductor. Then, part of the insulating layer is removed by a laser to form an anti-fuse opening in the insulating layer. Part of the first conductor and part of the second conductor are exposed through the anti-fuse opening. After that, a under bump metallurgy layer is formed in the anti-fuse opening to connect the first conductor and the second conductor electrically.