Anti-glare laminate with controlled surface roughness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anti-glare laminates for liquid crystal display devices struggle to balance image reflection prevention, blurred character suppression, scratch resistance, and shape stability, often compromising on one or more of these properties.

Innovation Solution

An anti-glare laminate structure comprising a polycarbonate resin base material layer, a high-hardness resin layer, and a hard coat layer, with specific surface roughness and thickness parameters, and a production method involving a patterned PET film transfer process to achieve the desired balance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If fine particles are added to form surface unevenness for anti-glare effect, then image reflection prevention is improved, but scratch resistance is reduced due to particles acting as abrasives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage reflectionVSAvoidscratch resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the fine particles from the hard coat layer composition. By eliminating the particle addition step, the hard coat layer maintains high scratch resistance while the anti-glare effect is achieved through the inherent unevenness of the hard coat surface formed during the curing process, without particles acting as abrasives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of adding particles to create surface unevenness (conventional approach), the patent inverts the approach by forming unevenness through the curing process itself without any additive particles. The anti-glare effect is generated by the surface morphology developed during UV irradiation curing rather than by embedded particles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If haze is increased to achieve anti-glare performance, then image reflection prevention is improved, but visibility is reduced due to whitish impression

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage reflectionVSAvoidvisibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the haze parameter within a specific range (5% ≤ haze < 15%) to achieve the desired balance. By controlling the haze value rather than maximizing it, the patent prevents excessive light scattering that causes whitening, while still achieving sufficient anti-glare effect. The surface unevenness parameters (Sq and Sdq) are also precisely controlled to regulate light scattering behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using a moderate amount of surface unevenness (controlled Sq and Sdq values) rather than excessive unevenness. This partial unevenness is sufficient to scatter reflected light and prevent image reflection, while avoiding excessive scattering that would cause whitening and reduce visibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Strength

If hard coat layer is made thicker to improve scratch resistance, then durability is improved, but shape stability is reduced due to warpage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescratch resistanceVSAvoidshape stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the hard coat layer thickness within a specific range (1-10 μm) to balance scratch resistance and shape stability. By controlling the thickness parameter and combining it with controlled surface unevenness (Sq: 0.05-0.40 μm, Sdq: 0.020-0.10), the patent achieves sufficient scratch protection while minimizing warpage during storage and use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If surface unevenness is increased to prevent image reflection, then anti-glare performance is improved, but transmitted light scattering increases causing blurred characters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage reflectionVSAvoidcharacter clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent precisely controls the surface unevenness parameters (Sq and Sdq) within specific ranges to optimize the balance between anti-glare effect and character clarity. By limiting Sq to 0.05-0.40 μm and Sdq to 0.020-0.10, the patent ensures that light scattering is sufficient to prevent image reflection but not excessive to cause blurred characters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The laminate achieves a balance between preventing image reflection, suppressing blurred characters, ensuring high scratch resistance, and maintaining excellent shape stability, while maintaining visibility and durability.

Implementation Method 1

The anti-glare film can scatter outside light by the uneven shape of the surface, thereby preventing reduction of visibility due to outside light reflection or image reflection

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 2

a patterned PET film is pressed onto the surface of the hard coat layer to transfer an uneven shape

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure transfer: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentEP4675319A1Anti-glare laminate and production method for same
Publication Date: 2026.01.07 MITSUBISHI GAS CHEM CO INC
  • EP4675319A1 patent drawing
  • EP4675319A1 patent drawing
  • EP4675319A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides an anti-glare laminate that has, in order, a base material layer that includes at least a polycarbonate resin (a1), a high-hardness resin layer that includes a high-hardness resin (B), and a hard coat layer, wherein the root mean square gradient (Sdq) and the root mean square height (Sq) of the hard coat layer satisfy (i) and (ii), respectively. 0.010≤Sdq≤0.10 0.040≤Sq≤0.40