Antimicrobial covers for rails

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for reducing microbe growth and transmission on frequently touched surfaces, such as hospital bed rails and public handrails, are either costly or require extensive disinfection efforts, which are often neglected due to budget constraints and time constraints.

Innovation Solution

The development of antimicrobial rail cover assemblies with L-shaped lips and spring-loaded joining clips, made from antimicrobial materials, that can be quickly installed without specialized training, providing a biocidal treatment to reduce microbe growth and transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If antimicrobial materials are used to replace entire structures like hospital beds, then microbe growth and transmission are reduced, but the cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrobe growth and transmissionVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the antimicrobial protection into separate cover portions that can be applied to specific high-touch surfaces (rails, headboards, footboards) rather than requiring complete replacement of entire structures. This segmentation allows antimicrobial materials to be used where most needed while controlling costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies antimicrobial materials locally to specific contact surfaces that require protection rather than uniformly across entire structures. The cover portions are designed to fit specific areas like rails and adjoining surfaces, providing targeted antimicrobial protection where microbe transmission is most likely to occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional rail covers are installed, then cost is reduced, but installation requires personnel training and time-consuming procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The joiner incorporates spring-loaded portions that provide dynamic engagement with the cover portions. The spring mechanism allows for easy insertion and secure holding without requiring precise alignment or specialized installation skills, making the installation process straightforward and reducing training requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The joiner acts as an intermediary component that simplifies the connection between cover portions. By using the spring-loaded joiner with aligned slots, the installation process becomes more intuitive and less complex, serving as a mediator that bridges the cover portions in an easy-to-install manner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If active disinfection of contact surfaces is performed, then microbe transmission is reduced, but it is time-consuming and often neglected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrobe transmissionVSAvoiddisinfection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The antimicrobial materials are applied to the cover portions in advance during manufacturing, providing pre-established protection. This preliminary action means that when the covers are installed on rails and surfaces, the antimicrobial protection is already active, eliminating the need for repeated disinfection activities and reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The antimicrobial materials provide continuous protection as long as the cover portions remain in place, maintaining ongoing antimicrobial activity without requiring periodic intervention. This continuous useful action replaces the need for repeated discrete disinfection events, saving time and ensuring consistent protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The antimicrobial rail cover assemblies effectively reduce microbe growth and transmission by 99.98% within 45 minutes, offering a long-term solution that is easy to install and maintain, without the need for periodic disinfection, using materials like polymeric resin with copper oxide particles and enhanced surface texturing for improved biocidal activity.

Implementation Method 1

Each joiner includes a first spring-loaded portion engaging the first cover portion and a second spring-loaded portion engaging the second cover portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20170013969A1Antimicrobial covers for rails
Publication Date: 2017.01.19 EOS SURFACES LLC
  • US20170013969A1 patent drawing
  • US20170013969A1 patent drawing
  • US20170013969A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A rail cover assembly includes first and second cover portions with surface regions made from an antimicrobial material. The first cover portion has opposing and longitudinally-extending L-shaped lips with at least one pair of first slots defined at opposing locations along the lips. The second cover portion has opposing longitudinal edges for nesting with the first cover portion's lips, and has at least one pair of second slots defined at opposing locations along the edges in alignment with a corresponding pair of the first slots. A joiner is partially engaged in each of the first slots and partially engaged in a correspondingly aligned one of the second slots. Each joiner includes a first spring-loaded portion engaging the first cover portion and a second spring-loaded portion engaging the second cover portion.