Local Antineoplastic Particle Delivery with Systemic Immunotherapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cancer treatments often struggle to effectively target tumors while minimizing systemic toxicity and enhancing immune response.

Innovation Solution

The method involves the local administration of antineoplastic agent particles, such as taxane particles, directly to tumors, combined with systemic administration of an immunotherapeutic agent, to stimulate both local and systemic immune responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional systemic chemotherapy is used to treat cancer, then tumor cells can be targeted throughout the body, but systemic toxicity increases and immune response is not effectively enhanced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecancer treatment efficacyVSAvoidsystemic toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment is divided into two distinct components: local delivery of antineoplastic particles directly to the tumor site and systemic delivery of immunotherapeutic agents. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specialized function - the particles provide localized cytotoxic effect while the immunotherapeutic agent stimulates systemic immune response, thereby reducing overall systemic toxicity compared to traditional chemotherapy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by delivering antineoplastic particles directly to the tumor through various local administration routes (topical, intratumoral, intraperitoneal, pulmonary). This creates a high concentration of drug at the tumor site while maintaining low systemic levels, thereby achieving effective tumor treatment with reduced systemic toxicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If traditional chemotherapy is used to treat cancer, then tumor cells can be targeted, but immune response enhancement is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecancer treatment efficacyVSAvoidimmune response capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two different therapeutic approaches: local delivery of antineoplastic particles and systemic delivery of immunotherapeutic agents. This combination creates a synergistic effect where the particles kill tumor cells locally and release tumor antigens, which then stimulate the immunotherapeutic agent to activate a systemic immune response, thereby enhancing overall cancer treatment efficacy beyond what either therapy could achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The immunotherapeutic agent acts as an intermediary that bridges the local tumor destruction caused by antineoplastic particles and the systemic immune response. The particles destroy tumor cells and release antigens, which the immunotherapeutic agent then utilizes to activate and direct the immune system against cancer cells throughout the body.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If local administration of antineoplastic particles is used, then systemic toxicity is reduced, but comprehensive tumor coverage is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystemic toxicityVSAvoidtumor treatment coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment strategy segments the cancer fight into local and systemic components. Local administration of antineoplastic particles handles the primary tumor burden with minimal systemic exposure, while systemic administration of immunotherapeutic agents provides comprehensive coverage against metastatic disease and residual tumor cells throughout the body, thereby achieving both reduced toxicity and comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12329858B2Local delivery of antineoplastic particles in combination with systemic delivery of immunotherapeutic agents for the treatment of cancer
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 CRITITECH INC
  • US12329858B2 patent drawing
  • US12329858B2 patent drawing
  • US12329858B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are combination therapy methods useful for the therapeutic treatment of cancer by combining local administration of compositions containing antineoplastic particles, such as taxane particles, with systemic administration of compositions containing immunotherapeutic agents. Local administration methods include topical application, pulmonary administration, intratumoral injection, intraperitoneal injection, and intracystic injection.