Antipollution Device Housing Forming Controller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing antipollution device housings are time-consuming and costly due to inaccuracies in forming the main, end, and transition portions relative to the specific dimensions of the catalyst-bearing bricks and mats, leading to frequent failures and impaired performance.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that use a controller and sets of members to engage the workpiece, receiving dimensional data for the bricks and mats to calculate and form the housing dimensions accurately, ensuring the mat is compressed to a preselected density and the end and transition portions are formed without deforming the main portion, using a machine head subassembly with finger and jaw elements to precisely shape the housing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional methods are used to form housing portions, then manufacturing is simpler, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inaccuracies in forming main, end, and transition portions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehousing dimension accuracyVSAvoidforming process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The housing formation process is segmented into distinct operations: forming the main portion with calculated dimensions, then separately forming end portions and transition portions. Each portion is formed by dedicated forming members that can be independently controlled, allowing precise formation of each segment without affecting others.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The main portion of the housing is formed first with calculated dimensions based on brick and mat measurements. This preliminary action establishes the reference framework before forming the end and transition portions, ensuring that subsequent portions are formed relative to accurate baseline dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If traditional forming methods are used, then process time is shorter, but productivity deteriorates due to frequent failures and rework

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuccessful housing formation rateVSAvoidtime for forming operations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback through calculation of target dimensions based on actual brick and mat measurements. The controller receives dimensional data, calculates appropriate housing dimensions, and adjusts forming member positions accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to variations in component dimensions to ensure successful formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The forming process dynamically changes parameters including target dimensions, forming member positions, and compression forces based on measured brick and mat dimensions. This allows the system to adapt to each unique set of components, maximizing the probability of successful formation while minimizing rework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If calculated dimensions are used for main portion, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity increases due to controller and measurement requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemain portion dimension accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves multiple functions: receiving dimensional data from measurement devices, calculating target dimensions for the housing portions, controlling the positions of multiple forming members, and coordinating the sequential formation operations. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated systems for each operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between the measurement devices and the forming members. It receives raw dimensional data, processes it through calculations, and translates it into control signals for the forming members, simplifying the overall system architecture by centralizing the intelligence required for precise formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP2215337B1Apparatus and method for forming an antipollution device housing
Publication Date: 2017.07.26 GWS TUBE FORMING SOLUTIONS
  • EP2215337B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2215337B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP2215337B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

An apparatus and a method for manufacturing a housing of an antipollution device including one or more bricks supported by one or more mats therein. One or more main portions are formed, the main portion of the housing defining a formed chamber in which the brick(s) compress the mat(s) between the brick(s) and the main portion to a predetermined density. One or more end portions are formed, for connection of the antipollution device in an exhaust system. When one or more transition portions are formed to connect the main portion(s) and the end portion(s), the main portion(s) is engaged by the apparatus to resist deformation of the formed chamber.